Possibly controversial: Totem arro overrated?


Alright, I may very well need to put on my flame suit here. Now let me preface by saying this: I had a pair of Totem Arros and loved them I found them to be lovely little speakers with a high WAF and lovely finishing details. What I didn't really witness however, was the unbelievable imaging that everyone talks about, the image would waver from left to right and become sort of ubiquitous when it should be dead center.

Comparatively, for instance, I've picked up a pair of Martin Logan SL3, and using the same amp and source, I'm getting a rock-solid center image and more depth and width to the soundstage. Are my ears inferior? Is it more so just a continuance of Totem Acoustic marketing when people wax lyrical about the arro's "magical" imaging capabilities? I hate to rock the boat here, but this is just something that I've been thinking about for the past few weeks and I wanted to see if others had thought the same.

David
128x128aenergi
Could be the room and placement. I have heard them before and they are nice little speakers. Maybe the MLs suit your room better. Good for you, that you found what you have been missing all along. Enjoy your music.
Slikric3000, hilarious comment, kudos.

Milpai: I am certainly not saying that the arros aren't nice, I enjoyed their sound and thought they were fast and seductive sounding little gems, I simply did not observe the unbelievable imaging that others have described.

Was just wondering if anyone else had run into the same conundrum as myself.