I don’t know what can be gleaned from the specific design, but, I don’t think the location of the pivot and counterweight is an issue, even from a theoretical perspective. The supposed “ideal” is neutral balance, which is the center of gravity being in line with the pivot; it is not the case that the pivot or the counterweight or the center of gravity having to be in line with the record surface. I don’t know of many arms where the pivot is at the height of the record. Arms where the counterweight is substantially lower than the pivot are common, particularly with unipivot arms, because this is inherently stable. But stable configurations resist movement away from the stable balance position which means increased tracking force when riding up a warp and decreased force riding down.
I have not heard the arm, but it would have to perform miracles to justify its price, in my opinion. For someone with much better finances, I can see it being a reasonable purchase with far less of a holy payback.