I'm building twelve 4x8 panels using 2" rigid Johns Manville 817 panels:
http://www.jm.com/insulation/performance_materials/products/ci9_800series_spin-glas.pdf
Look at the table showing sound absorption coefficient at 125Hz for 1" and 2" thickness. You can see that 1" panel is useless at lower frequencies in spite of 817 material being twice dense (and 2x more expensive) than standard 814 (more common). Ideal would be the panel made of two 817s (without backing) - total 4" in thickness but unfortunately there is also WAF.
Corning also sells this stuff and is more common in some areas.
http://www.jm.com/insulation/performance_materials/products/ci9_800series_spin-glas.pdf
Look at the table showing sound absorption coefficient at 125Hz for 1" and 2" thickness. You can see that 1" panel is useless at lower frequencies in spite of 817 material being twice dense (and 2x more expensive) than standard 814 (more common). Ideal would be the panel made of two 817s (without backing) - total 4" in thickness but unfortunately there is also WAF.
Corning also sells this stuff and is more common in some areas.