Forrest for the trees.
Commerical music now and then ... Has always been commercial (sellable) because it was what people wanted to listen to of what was available.
@tylermunns Couldn't agree more! I've given up on major film releases. The best movies are now on various streaming services in the form of the mini series, you get some damn character development. I much prefer the classic movies/film on TCM, I guess people don't care about story lines anymore, action and escape from reality is what they seek. I don't care about the tenth remake of some lame movie which seems to be profit model for theatrical releases these days.
Contemporary music nothing like this, major studios don't control the music business like they did back in the bad old days. There is so much obscure never heard of artists out there via streaming services, how one couldn't find some wonderful music is beyond me |
For sure you can repeat fact that are not even wrong... And call that the truth... Or you can try to understand what i spoke about.... When Josquin Des Prez was dead, all Europe was sad....Not because they lost a commercial artist.... Guess why they were sad? When Scriabin died in Russia it was the same lost all across Russia... it was the lost of a popular artist idolized for his non economical value... But you can call the deal with the devil also a "commercial" affair because the soul is sellable...A popular deal in some circle dont make it a commercial affair though ... Anyway the devil dont consumate souls , he is very picky... Very educated ...He choose... By definition,commercial culture is the death of culture... Consumerism created by Freud nephew is destruction of human soul and spirit...It was anticipated by Bernard Mandeville, before Marx and Freud , "the master of us all" said the austrian economist Hayek ... Unlike the WEF said, conditioning of mind by consumerism is not education... Commercial music is not first and last thought about to be a musical fact and to be produced like one ....It is something created to be sell...It is not created to be "art".... It is the reason why i distinguish popular music and commercial music...It is not a clear cut absolute distinction for sure but this dont invalidate my point... Bob Dylan is a popular true artist.... Not primarily a commercial product...
|
I couldn't agree more. I've always loved CCR, Chicago, B,S&T etc. |
@sns Yeah, I agree. The access we have today to music from any era is amazing. It’s awesome. I wish I had it in my 20s. I agree with those that find the popular mode of modern music consumption unceremonious and utilitarian, just an endless, homogeneous matrix of files. However, no one twists our arm to only stream and only listen to digital files. One can still listen to music in any format. I would just like to see something where this more immediate, fluid music commerce of today could also provide artists with better pay! |