Feels nice to be seen as a teenager again after 3 decades 😆
- ...
- 65 posts total
"to reduce the errors made by the additional amplification" Nonsense. Why should high power amplifiers have more 'errors'? Presumably you mean distortion. Fact is the flea-power single-ended single-figure watt valve amplifiers have far higher distortion than properly designed high power amplifiers. In many cases more than 1% distortion compared with 0.01% in high power amps. But some people don't mind listening to distortion and in many cases say they actually like it. |
In the vast majority of cases these very low distortion figures are achieved by judicious application of NFB which can often result in other sonic compromises. I agree that some listeners may strongly prefer the 1% (Or higher) distortion (2nd order predominantly) amplifier with little or no utilization of NFB. I believe that we can agree it’s purely a matter of what type of sound quality and presentation a listener seeks and desires. Choices abound for either direction. Which in my opinion is a good occurrence. Charles |
Having owned less sensitive speakers and high powered amplifiers, e.g. 84db and 86db with up to 300 WPC, they could not match the dynamics and spontaneous pop of more sensitive speakers.  Even with lower powered amps, e.g. 25 WPC, a set of 90db and 93db were significantly faster and more exciting.  So yes, regardless of amplifier higher sensitivity can mean a more dynamic sound. |
Lower distortion and better low level detail. FWIW: See the article below the importance of speaker efficiency. Mike http://www.lansingheritage.org/html/jbl/reference/technical/efficiency.htm |
- 65 posts total