I can see how it would be harder to control resonance of larger boxes. But, many of the designs that employ heroic measures to control resonance tend to sound a bit sterile, lifeless and lacking in "weight" (thin and anemic sounding). I have no idea if this is because of the resonance control or some other design choices, but, I will say that I don't look at ANY design choice as being dispositive of whether the sound will be good or bad and I don't rule out any speaker just because it is designed or built in a particular way. I've heard some really nice speakers with big cabinets with thin, almost flimsy looking walls that have to be resonating--whether they sound good because of the resonance or despite it, I cannot say for certain.
What is your take on high efficient speakers vs. low efficient speakers?
Consider both designs are done right and your other equipment is well matched with the speakers. Do you have any preference when it comes to sound quality? Is it matter of economic decision when it comes to price? - power amps can become very expensive when power goes up, on the other hand large, efficient speakers are expensive as well. Is your decision based on room size? I'd love to hear from you on the subject.
- ...
- 187 posts total
@tannoy56 wrote:
IMHO, compared to higher efficiency speakers typically incorporating horns or waveguides at least as hybrid designs (in conjunction with a direct radiating woofer/mids) or more radically as all-horns, a very general observation could be made that low efficiency, direct radiating speakers are less dense and present/direct sounding (paradoxically perhaps when being called 'direct radiating'), while also being dynamically more muted (and less lively overall). Low eff. speakers sometimes have an airier presentation, perhaps due to involving more reflected sound and having a more laid-back, less full sounding imprinting. Very good high eff. speakers have this "lit from within" and ignited quality that really makes music spark and come to life effortlessly, and the larger iterations have a fully immersive and physical yet relaxed presence to them that's quite addictive ones you get used to it. |
phusis, Thank you for an excellent description of what is most prized about the sound of high efficiency systems, particularly, horn-based systems. While good design of such systems will ameliorate midrange "peaky" or "nasal" colorations, such systems do tend to be a bit less smooth in frequency response than better low-efficiency direct radiating speakers. I hesitate to say this because so many people have heard grossly uneven horn and wide range high efficiency driver systems, and do associate such systems with such coloration, but I will say that such problems can be effectively ameliorated in better designs. Still, I can see why such systems will not be to everyone's taste. |
@tannoy56 wrote: "What would you say are the attributes of low efficient speakers? Anyone?" Low efficiency speakers will give you deeper bass response for a given enclosure size, often dramatically so. The obvious implication of the above is, low-efficiency speakers tend to have much higher "spouse acceptance factors". As was mentioned previously, low efficiency speakers tend to have wider dispersion, this because designs which result in high efficiency (such as horns) tend to have deliberately narrowed dispersion. Whether wide or narrow dispersion is better is subject to debate, and imo depends on the room itself and other other considerations. Some horns have coloration, which imo eliminates them from serious contention. At the risk of over-generalizing, I’d be wary of horns which have sharp-edged internal "kinks" and/or sharp edges around the mouth. In general smooth frequency response is less expensive to achieve with low-efficiency speakers than with high-efficiency speakers. This is because there are inevitable tradeoffs in driver design, and some of the characteristics which contribute to response smoothness work against high efficiency, and vice-versa. I’m sure there are other attributes of low-efficiency speakers which I have overlooked. Imo amplifier + speakers + room = "a system within a system". Typically the room is the most expensive component, and the most difficult to upgrade, implying that the speakers and the amp(s) should be chosen to work well in that particular room as well as with each other. Imo, ime, ymmv. Duke High-efficiency speaker manufacturer |
- 187 posts total