Apples and oranges


Every poster here, of course, has his own view of what’s good or bad sounding. One person may have an extremely advanced system, another a fairly rudimentary one.  Yet, both speak to each other in the same forum as if they’re talking about the same thing.

Apples and oranges

128x128rvpiano

It sounds like you are really referring to the listener's knowledge and sophistication rather than their system.

I have had to pull away from the herd, as my hearing, tastes, and wives change.

Onhwy61, I agree! A listener's degree of knowledge and sophistication are what makes a discussion interesting and an open mind can make them productive. The problem inherent with this hobby is that the interest level amongst audiophiles is so divergent its hard to find two people on the same wave length. Too many false gods, I think.  The sonic value (as well as the financial value) of components being one of them. Sadly I think we have become a 'plug in' community. 

I agree,  objectification of component worth based on cost can be problematic. I also sometimes move in divergent ways, lots of diy experimentation, feel this not respected by some.

 

I try to respect everyone's system and choices, the sheer amount of variables involved should give one pause. Many paths available for reaching goals.