Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy

Now addressing this bit in OP:

@fleschler 

Some of the posters music choices range from rap to hip hop and anything pop oriented created in the past from 1995.  

How on earth did this pass as an argument? "Some of the posters" listen to this and some other music?  What if they did?  That makes them less of a music lover and audiophile?

The tastes of our membership runs the gamut just like it does in any forum.  We have a long list pinned to our home page: 

It has nearly 16,000 tracks/albums people love!  Clearly OP has no idea about our music preferences any more than he does about every other thing he claimed there.

Long term listening is still the gold standard of audio evaluation

I thought our aural memory was very short. 

@amir_asr , I saw the pic of your system, can you comment on why you chose those speakers? I know they must measure nice but a lot of speakers measure nice. Why those? Are you here to discuss audio or throw rocks at the OP like a "miscreant"?

My first post, so feel free to attack me. As a new member, all I see is a bunch of irate people desperately trying to defend their investment in suboptimal equipment by claiming that they are somehow gifted  in their hearing, but without the balls to actually put that to a blind test. Indeed they seem so insecure in their own beliefs that they respond with vitriol and illogic when challenged. 

Now maybe not all of you are like that. I hope so. But please, those people, come forward and say so. 

@tonywinga 

Danny, a real audio and measurement guy tests and tears down speakers costing thousands of dollars and shows us the low cost parts inside. 

He does with the clear aim of making a ton of money from you.  He claims to have upgraded this and that part.  While he measures the speaker, he refuses to provide any measurements showing these upgrades have any value in this regard. He also does NOT listen to any upgraded speaker.  He claims "he just knows" it makes the sound better.  I am sure.... Someone said to follow the money.  I said you are not and here is perfect proof of it.

Why not be more critical of company's claims when they are trying to sell you something?  Why not hold them to a high standard of proof?  Danny says it with that charming southern accent so must be true?

The kits he sells are hugely overpriced. None of his DIY solutions are competitive. By the time you waste all that money on his upgraded parts, you could get far better performing speakers across the board.

I tested his GLK 2.0 which was absolutely terrible even though it has all those upgraded parts: 

Really, if you are into hero worshipping and appeal to authority instead of facts and knowledge, we don't have much to talk about.