Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy
"Audiophiles are Snobs" Youtube features an idiot! He states, with no equivocation, that $5,000 and $10,000 speakers sound equally good and a $500 and $5,000 integrated amp sound equally good. He is either deaf or a liar or both!
There is a site filled with posters like him called Audio Science Review. If a reasonable person posts, they immediately tear him down, using selected words and/or sentences from the reasonable poster as100% proof that the audiophile is dumb and stupid with his money. They also occasionally state that the high end audio equipment/cable/tweak sellers are criminals who commit fraud on the public. They often state that if something scientifically measures better, then it sounds better. They give no credence to unmeasurable sound factors like PRAT and Ambiance. Some of the posters music choices range from rap to hip hop and anything pop oriented created in the past from 1995.
Have any of audiogon (or any other reasonable audio forum site) posters encountered this horrible group of miscreants?
Good deal. Please list the audio measurement gear you use and some of the data produced by it. And once there, please explain why you measure at all as some folks here seem to not like them at all. |
@amir_asr do I get it right what you say: -130dB using Amazon RCA basic cables in not shielded chamber? Without power filters or RFI noise control etc? |
@fleschler +1 on putting ASR reviews “under review”! :-) |
Good deal. But are we done with your conspiracy theory of me chasing money? If not, please state your remaining objection so I can address it. And yes, it is absolutely important to me that my ethics are not questions in that manner. |
By background is linked to in my signature on ASR. Here it is: You can also look at my linkedin profile: Amir Majidimehr - Founder - Audio Science Review | LinkedIn I am not a lab technician if that is what you are asking. Is your profile public somewhere? |
