My listening tests in reviews is provided on "as is" basis. I do them because if I didn't, I would get more complaints. "Oh, he doesn't listen." I have tried to make more sense out of them by developing the EQ technique. The outcome there has been quite positive with many trying my EQ profiles and liking them over stock performance. If folks want to ignore them -- and many do -- it is no skin of my nose. I perform them because I am curious myself how the measurements translate into sound and a form of listening training.
That all makes sense to me. Given the range of audiophile viewpoints you can't please everyone. If you don't listen, you'll get complaints about that. If you do listen, you'll get complaints that you aren't using a rigorous enough protocol. If you use a rigorous blind protocol, you'll get pushback from the anti-blind-test faction who think blind tests obscure results and you should have listened "in relaxed sighted conditions, like a normal audiophile."
Personally, I think that yeah, blind listening to speakers would hue most consistently to the ASR remit. But your compromise of "here are my impressions take them or leave them" seems a reasonable compromise.