Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy

I found this quite interesting and it appears the folks over at this site do quite a bit of testing. They seem to be very transparent about their test equipment, methodology and end goals in testing. They even make a statement as such.

You consider it transparent, I consider it amateur. It is interesting that you consider this transparent, but do not give the same consideration to ASR. This was my first Google hit. The difference in level of detail and depth and quality of the information is not subtle.

only issue i have with his testing method is he never tests in actual use just isolated on his tester / bench. so, he won't see interactions of the components and how they affect each other just the raw test of the single component / cable.  No interaction of a speaker cable to the amp and speaker for example. no indication of issues with a component not liking the impedance or capacitance of a cable etc. Testing in isolation is only part of the story. 

Other than that, it's just more information to make an educated assessments prior to listening for yourself. 

Jonathan Swift would have had a field day with these guys.

@crymeanaudioriver as nonoise said you do dance on a pin head and that makes you.

Let the man speak for himself. No one here cares what you think.

You are the Deer Tick of the forums. (not my words but appropriate) 

Are you @amir_asr internet bodyguard? 

19 user names? 

As I said @amir_asr what say you? I do not go on your site very often as the equipment you test is not of any interest to me

@amir_asr 

Will you follow ?

Not everyone here agrees with you (shocking) and don't want to "blindly" follow.

Here is an article on audio equipment break in, why not ask Home Theater Review for their data and you can report back OK? Good luck with that...