I personally hate full range DSP in two channel. When I’ve tried in the past from solutions between MiniDSP & Dirac to the higher end Legacy Wavelet, DSP always seemed to affect the amount of breath, decay, and air and made the sound much more sterile. What I do appreciate is DSP in biwire or subwoofer integration situations, where DSP can be applied to 300Hz and below. I find this is the most useful application and rely on room treatments to handle the remainder of high frequency absorbption and diffusion. Of course I use bass traps to absorb unwanted bass frequencies as well.
DSP vs New Cables ??
For two channel listening DSP can be a bit unnerving for the die hard listener who wants pure sound. However, of late, the Technology has improved and DSP impact to address room issues can be really quite nice. You will very likely notice an impact. When you get new cables you may notice something but it may not be dramatic enough to impress you vs DSP.
Home theater DSP much easier if you have a good processor or receiver. And this can have a meaningful impact and cables may have a lesser impact.
So my executive decision of the day is to defer buying new cables (was planning to spend 3K for some interconnects, transparent or silteck). So I'll revisit dsp for home theater. Two channel Will require new stuff and I'm a bit Leary to introduced more stuff along the signal path but I hear it's not that bad and won't really restrict the path, hard to tell.
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total