@mikelavigne “digital…won’t equal vinyl in my lifetime…”
You must have died about 35 years ago. Thanks for making a reappearance on Halloween.
The character of analog and digital
Having just obtained some high quality analogue components, I want make some comments on the character of both analog and digital.
First of all it’s very difficult to speak of analog in general. Records vary widely (indeed wildly) in sonic character and quality. Digital recordings are much more uniform. When you play a digital file you more or less know what your getting. Of course some sound better than others, but there is a consistency of character. With records, it’s the Wild West. Variation in SQ and character are rampant.
Therefore it becomes very difficult to make generalizations on which categorically sounds better.
@mikelavigne “digital…won’t equal vinyl in my lifetime…”
You must have died about 35 years ago. Thanks for making a reappearance on Halloween. |
I read many years ago and agree and still think it’s true…. “To like digital you have to stop listening to analogue vinyl.” I find the best analogue vinyl sounds much better than digital. also, much pure analogue vinyl recordings from the past sound better than their recent digitized vinyl reissues. Just about all new vinyl, reissues included, are now digitized and then converted back to analogue before pressing. New cutting lathes are digital. I hear a loss of musicality in most new reissued vinyl. new music on a good dac sounds pretty good. but most music from the 50’s thru the 90’s sounds pretty bad in digital when compared to the original vinyl. I think we are stuck with crappy conversion from those early digital years. |
@sudnh try some of the Analog Productions reissues. I’m really digging the classical and jazz these guys are putting out very good quality vinyl. |