What Does It Take To Surpass A SME V?


Thinking about the possibility of searching for a new tonearm. The table is a SOTA Cosmos Eclipse. Cartridge currently in use is a Transfiguration Audio Proteus, and it also looks like I will also have an Ortofon Verismo if a diamond replacement occurs without incident. 

The V is an early generation one but in good condition with no issues. Some folks never thought highly of the arm, others thought it quite capable. So it's a bit decisive. 

The replacement has to be 9 to 10.5 inches. I have wondered if Origin Live is worth exploring? Perhaps a generation old Triplanar from the pre owned market?

 Any thoughts on what are viable choices? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

neonknight

@neonknight In relation to your wondering if OL are worth exploring.

The Tonearm I am familiar with for this Company is the Illustrious.

SME OL and Audiomods are Companies that have their TOTL Tonearms from a certain era formed from using the Rega Design and Geometry. 

SME have remained Loyal to the Rega Geometry and maintained a Singular Material used for the Arm Wand.

OL have maintained the Rega Geometry, but evolved to using Composite Materials for the Arm Wands t to the Higher End Models, but keep a Singular Arm Wand Material reserved for the lower in cost models.

Audiomods have maintained the Rega Geometry, and have joined the competition with OL and have a Composite Material used for their Series Six Arm Wand.

I own a SME IV, Adiomods Series V ( Singlar Material Arm Wand) and have been in the the company of the OL Illustrious on quite a few occasions.

There is little if any real difference between the SME IV and Audiomods Series Five. Each are quite similar in all areas of a Vinyl Replay.

When being demonstrated the OL Illustrious, there are sonics and a presentation I am quite familiar with, and this encourages me to feel the Three Tonearms are all much of muchness.

When the IV and Series V have been compared to the Tonearm I am using now. The most noticeable difference is how constrained the IV and Series Five are perceived to be influenced, there seems to be too much imparted from the design as a control, which has come to be identified with as not for the better.

When the restricted freedom is observed and the loss of detail from the recording is being witnessed is associated with the constrained manner the arm seemingly functions within, these arms can quickly become less attractive to a Arm in use that does not create this impression.

The Arm in use today, leaves a really difficult assessment to discover where it might have a fault that is unwanted on the replay, the detail and structure of the recording are laid out to be experienced in a manner that is extremely attractive and more of the capabilities is wanted regularly.

For me, after a long marriage to the SME IV and a Shorter Affair with the Series Five,  it was a very easy decision to Separate from each of these and bring into the Set Up the latest Tonearm of Choice.   

Even better for when the HiFi System is set back up for regular use, the latest Tonearm of Choice has a few tweaks which I have been instrumental in having some of the latest additions developed, and been Party to the Demonstrations during changes put in place.

I know there is the X Factor now available for this Arm, the sum of the Work undertaken has a finished function that is quite something and totally optimised for the already, very attractive and special design.  

Viv Labs Rigid Float 7".

Have heard this against SME V, Kuzma 4Point 9" and Kuzma 313 Reference and it stomped all over them musical, dynamic and engaging and dead easy to set up.

I own a SME V on a SOTA Cosmos. Images sent to Alfred point it to being a first generation arm. The question becomes do I sell it and replace it, or keep it as is. I dont think it makes much sense to spend money on a rebuild of it. But that is just my personal leaning.