thanks for the detailed analysis; I agree with it, for the most part. Would add that the construction methods and skill also matter.
But, if cable materials and construction were the whole story, there would be far fewer cable deniers. It seems strange that some people who can not hear the differences seek to project their disability onto others. Haven’t we all, at some point, at least compared zip cord to something more exotic?
Even for Chinese manufacturers who try to describe their cables, it can be difficult to understand what they are trying to say.
I went ahead and bought some Viborg “pure silver” interconnects, which seem to me to be excellent, and a relative bargain (the $350 ones, not their $2100 versions). Also some Viborg power plugs for dyi power cords, which I am convinced are at least as good as the best Furutech or Oyaide, at 1/5 the cost. Some of the top boutique cables use them. MPS makes some outstanding cables too, under their own name.
It’s an interesting question whether any IP is being infringed by, say, Chinese “Odin” cables. TM infringement requires a “likelihood of confusion as to source”, etc. But no audiophile would likely be fooled or confused, if they knew where the cables came from, or what the real thing really looks like, or costs. Secondary market, maybe so, though. But lawsuits would be very expensive and are unlikely to be very helpful.
I am curious about the Audioquest asian copies. I believe they can more or less duplicate the design and construction, but not the wire itself or outstanding construction quality. Could still be a relatively good buy.