Interesting situation! Do we need this....

switching back and forth will tell if Fluonce competes, beats or loses to KEF.

I'll repeat....It is NOT about what was better.....It was all about the satisfying experience listening to a set of speakers that certainly are NOT as good as the KEFs, but none the less, for six hours I was very well pleased.....I reiterated this above so we don't get side tracked....

maybe the OP simply prefers the Fluance...doesn't mean anyone else would...or not.

Never heard the Fluance speakers, but this is why I disagree that "high end" should necessarily be linked to price.  I think it's a reflection of the maker's intent.  If you're serious about making good sounding gear, it can be done at a fairly low price point. 

No doubt the Fluances have limited deep bass & dynamic range, and other compromises necessary to stay in budget.  No doubt, they are using the best components they can source with their cost constraints, and spent serious time voicing the design.  I think all Canadian companies are allowed access to a national testing facility.

The KEFs were designed & built to a more stringent set of standards and a significantly higher budget was allowed for the final speaker cost.  I have no doubt that they would out-perform the Fluances wrt those standards.  Voicing, though, is ultimately partly subjective.  Not everyone will agree with any design team's choices.

I can enjoy both my solid state Adcom with my cheaper speakers and my Tube amp with my Harbeths it’s a enjoyment for music either way I just get more joy from the glow of tubes💫

The better question is what was the result after you connected the kefs again?