Relative Importance of Analog Components


We see people struggling with what to upgrade next, or where to direct their attention if everything seems to be working fairly well. I'm probably a bit more inclined to give more importance to sources and less to speakers than most people, but in general I like to look at which component is the 'rate-limiting factor' which one holds back the rest and then concentrate on improving that.

But to look specifically at vinyl reproduction, I have the strong impression that out of the four main components, they can be ordered in importance of potential effect on sound like this:

Cartridge

Phono stage

Tonearm

Turntable

I'm sure other people would list those four in a different order. How would you rank them and why?

 

dogberry

Maybe i am old school but turntable/arm are the top of my list. Cartridge could be the last one, as even a modest mm would have a better chance to sing on a better platform than a top cartridge mounted on a much lesser turntable/arm combo. My current set up is turntable/arm/cartridge/ phono stage. I have solved the main part, and i know where to upgrade when ready.

 

 

I look at the cart and preamp as being equal and most important, and the arm and table as the tool that makes the cart work. 

Dear @dogberry  :  TRansducers always are the more important links in the audio system because with out transducers we can't listen MUSIC.

 

Now and taking in count that today almost no one owns only one cartridge then I think that the primary system link in alogue is the Phono Stage because is this unit the one that perhaps has the hardest work with the audio cartridge signal due that needs amplify that tiny lvelsignal over 10k times and needs to do it with very low noise and with very low developed distortions along to has a " perfect " inverse RIAA eq. that's an equalization f around 40dbs ! ! . The unit needs too all the facilities to handled any LOMC or MM/MI cartridges: it has to be universal and most be an active high gain unit with no SUT ( no pun intented. ). The Phono Stage main target most be to preserve the extremely sensible and tyny level cartridge recorded signal and I mean it: Preserve its quality. Extreme hard task for say the least.

Following with the same way of thinking the second link is the tonearm that has to be one that " accepts " cartridges with different compliance/weigth and stays inside the ideal resonance frequency.

After those links comes the cartridge where " ironically " the other two links operate as cartridge slaves.

Yes, TT is way important too but according with my way of thinking is not more important, critical yes but today TTs are really good.

 

Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,

R.

I can’t rank them as the weakest link would glare IMO.  Great cartridge is huge but has to have a great arm to perform at its best.  Then the phono stage has to be up to par with the arm/cart.   
 

Until I upgraded my tonearm to a basis vector 4 I thought the same thing as Russ above.  But man what a difference it made to my presentation it was jaw dropping compared to other upgrades I have made.  After all the arm just gives the cartridge a ride, right?   Man is that ever an understatement.   
 

 

Post removed