need amp recommendations for more separation of instruments


I've noticed that if I play music that only has a few instruments playing at the same time it generally sounds great, but, if it's got a lot of instruments playing different parts at the same time it all mushes together and you can't hear the individual instruments clearly. My current rig is a NAD M10 and Focal Aria 948s. At a store, I heard 948s paired with a front end costing about $100,000 and that system did not have this problem, at least it not to my ears. That tells me that with really good electronics this problem can be greatly reduced and that the problem is more with my electronics than it is with my speakers. But $100k is out of my budget. My questions are:

  1. Are there some classes or types of amplification that are notably better at getting separation between instruments in complex music?

2.  Are there some brands that are notably better at getting separation between instruments in complex music?

3.   How much would I need to spend to get something that solves this specific problem notably better than my NAD M10?

4. How much would I need to spend to get something that's a really good solution, where I probably wouldn't notice the problem unless I went out of my way to listen for it? (I know, this differs between people, but I'm still interested in your opinion).

Thanks,

ahuvia

Get 4 subs powered by one separate amp. 

Buy Berning monoblocks  for the Mid and tweeters

Spend a day with the guy in Georgia. $500 fee for a day.

The issue you are having is a shortcoming of all

audio gear. Symphony music can not sound as good

as a solo instrument.

 

Post removed 

The key is to place your amps as far apart as possible and if your speakers are capable, bi-amp them for further separation. 

 

Of course I'm joking (although I wouldn't be surprised to find out there are people that belief such silliness) but it's just as effective as different amps providing better or even different instrument separation. It's simple electronics. 

@ahuvia My suggestion is to use a separate power amp while keeping NAD as a preamp. You can take the signal from pre-out on the back of the NAD and connect it to a separate power amp to see if you can get what you are looking for. In my system, there are a number of amps that put each instrument in its own acoustical space separate from others. Krell KST 100 is one and Audio research 100.2 is another. KST 100 is rated at 100w 2 8Ohms, 200W @ 4Ohms, and 400W @ 2Ohms. AR 100.2 has similar ratings except 360W @ 2ohms. Your speaker is fully capable of resolving this, but it needs a good amp that can handle its low impedance.My advise is to find an amp that can deliver enough current to drive your speaker at low impedance.

 

I have no way to know how your setup sounds compared to mine, but we have a few things in common. 
 

My setup is a Pathos Classic One Mkiii (similar price point to your NAD) and I have Focal 836v speakers. I also had the opportunity to audition my speakers on the Krell mono block gear that intended for the Focal Grande Utopia speakers. You could say that I “heard things” that I’ve never heard since. I actually selected the 836v over the 816v primary based on the sound of a harp in a Josh Groban song. 
 

I recently upgraded my source to a Denafrips Ares II and them moved to a Morrow Audio MA4 balanced interconnect and the combination of the two really improved the instrument separation for me.  My setup is far from optimized due to the physical limitations of a relatively small house, but I would consider a better source (depending on what you have) as a potential place to make a big improvement.