They claim that the pivoted headshell deals with needle chatter.
I think this is exactly the point. I find the term "mistracking" quite vague and have yet to fine a "firm" definition of it. On the most basic level mistracking is any movement of the stylus that is not in the direction of the path made by the cutterhead. I do believe we are constantly mistracking and how the system deals with that behavior is critical to both the final sound and ultimate wear on a record over time. The net results of any mistracking are two fold; sonic degradation in the immediate and stylus/record wear in the long term.
Unfortunately this is not something that can be distilled down to the TAE being the "only number we have" so that is all that matters approach taken by some in this discussion. We first have to accept that for a given cartridge there is a distinct possibility that the sonic results of a 5° TAE will not be equivalent from tonearm to tonearm and I think that is the point that many who use and like the underhung arms are trying to make.
Is it possible to reverse the headshell 180 degrees with the RS and run a trailing pivoted headshell ?? Could be interesting.
Interestingly enough... I see two distinct problems with the concept of the RS-A1. Being able to align a stylus to a hidden uni-pivot bearing 17mm above it is a challenge and then only being given three pair of mounting holes at 6mm increments makes the concept of the pivot directly above the stylus a near impossibility. That said, when eyeballing it I have always picked the slots that error on trailing side since the thought of the stylus leading the pivot terrifies me. Of most importance the sound has never given me the feel that there was severe misalignment which lead me to much of my thinking above.
dave