Discuss The Viv Lab Rigid Arm

Interesting ideas. I have a RS Labs headshell. Need to give it a try on the Viv arm.

Mijo, what “law of physics “ is violated by an underhung tonearm? ( I won’t specify the RS Labs or the Viv, just the principle of an underhung tonearm with zero headshell offset angle.)

Dear @lewm and dear friends: You answer with a question instead to first answer my question because was you who posted that statement.

Which the " best " way for the cartridge can ride the LP groove modulations and at the same time pick up all " the reporded signal " in those modulatiuons?

Obviously that’s through a LT tonearm that in theory has not TAE and the cartridge will rides those critical modulations.

Next to that could comes the pivoted overungh tonearms that comes more or less with a maximum 1.5° on TAE.

I’m not talking of tracking distortions only that the stylus tip be in " perfect " alignment with the groove modulations to pick up the information. It’s obvious that a TAE of 1.5° does not permits to pick up 100% information very near but not what a LT can does.

Those for me is where we have to start before all those generated distortions of every kind.

Now, we have the VIV underhung tonearm that according Yamaha has not 3° or 5° but nothing less than 10° where the stylus tip just can’t pick up the recorded information in the same way, with the VIV what we listen is away from the recording comparing a 1.5° TAE tonearm or LT.

For me is more important what the cartridge can pick up that all the other " things " surrounded till we listen that LP modulations.

@melm posted that for him in his VIV the sounds is better than in the normal pivoted tonearm and that affirmation just can’t be true because to start the cartridge in the VIV can’t pick up ennough information ! ! !

My take is that the overall issue is about accuracy where 0° TAE in a LT is the champ, next that 1.5°  stylus tip TAE not accurated but the next nearest about and the that 10° stylus ti TAE than just can't rides adequated those groove modulations in the LP. What follow those facts has " no importance " till we understand where is the begin for.

R.

My goodness me, this thread has grown arms and legs.

As you know I have a 9" Viv Labs, the only people that can comment with any authority is those people that have heard one, once heard you can draw your own conclusions.

For information the place I bought mine from is the designer and manufacturer of Living Voice speakers and I know that Kevin Scott is highly regarded within the industry and is good friends with Frank Kuzma. I know for a fact that he has tried numerous arms, included some of the arms lorded by others in this thread and decided against them for no other reason than how they performed. What I am certain of there is no way he would promote or sell a product that he did not believe in. 

Raul, just to be accurate, 10 degrees TAE comes from Yamaha. And it applies to the extreme angle of the error their tonearm ever achieves. Obviously at the null point, the TAE is zero. I think the Yamaha is 7 inches. For underhung tonearms, max TAE goes down as length increases. Thus for a 9 inch Viv, the max TAE would be lower. When I first discerned that the RS LABS sounds so surprisingly good , despite the many weird aspects of its design, even disregarding it’s underhung-ness, it started me wondering whether TAE is so important to SQ. You yourself are no big fan of LT tonearms so far as I know, and you are on record for not liking 12 inch overhung tonearms which have less TAE than 9 inchers. So where is the evidence that minimal TAE is crucial?