Class H amps?

@arcticdeth arcticdeth "D is bad, H is good". That is the analog vs digital opinion just played on a different field? 

Just to clarify: I only wanted to know the basic differences and general assumption. And like with the old analog vs digital, it is likely 'cheap D is better and cheap H' (here: $100 CD player beats $100 turntable). 

So if Class H is still analog, what is BENEFIT over A/B. Just power consumption/weight? I get the benefit of full Class D (big power, low consumption, low weight, cheap) and why it is used in applications where those advantages are very benefitial (car amps for example, portable electronics, etc). 

@mike_in_nc +10

@kraftwerkturbo,

Emotiva XPA-DR1 amps are class H. See below:

Mike

https://emotiva.com/collections/amps/products/xpa-dr1

So if Class H is still analog, what is BENEFIT over A/B. Just power consumption/weight?

Yep, attempt to get to Class D efficiencies of manufacturing as well as power usage without the switching issues.

If the linear amp is kept in Class-A, then the efficiencies over a Class A are really outstanding. AFAIK, they make no claim that H is better sounding than A or A/B, but as good, with much higher efficiences.

The point made elsewhere, that it’s all in the implementation, is really important.

It may help to understand that due to FTC rules, most amplifiers have to be heavily overbuilt.  FTC rules require pre-heating at (I think) 30% of the rated power for an hour before testing for noise, distortion and output.  This is a situation never encountered in music.  If you have a 300 W amplifier, you don't play music at 100W continuously.  To meet the FTC requirements an amp must have excessively over-built heat sinks, which adds so much to manufacturing and transportation costs.  Anything that reduces the weight of an amplifier not only makes it cheaper to make, but greatly reduces the carbon footprint. 

Can an analog Class H still have (would make sense) a switched mode power supply (LOTS of weight saving right there)?