cleeds,
I can understand why someone might think that from what I just wrote. But if someone were familiar with lots of my stuff on audiogon as well as on ASR, they would understand why I'm here.
I really enjoy discussing the subjective nature of the hobby. The end result of all of this is "How Does It Sound?" I have found many subjective reviews and reports by audiophiles on gear both entertaining and useful, and I try to be useful to some degree for others when I've heard gear they may be interested in.
While I appreciate the approach over on ASR quite a lot, I also can find it gets a bit dry. It's not that ASR members don't love music as much as anyone here, or don't care about listening or the subjective aspect. But they tend to be wary of putting sound in to language - which goes along with their suspicion of subjective reviewing being little more than unreliable, fanciful poetry. I disagree heavily with them on that.
Here, people appreciate sharing subjective experience with equipment, so I get that aspect satisfied here. When I want a more rigorous look in to audio claims, I"ll tend to go to ASR for that.
This is why I'm always saying I don't want to tell any audiophile how he/she should approach the hobby. Some are far in to the "listening/subjectivity only" camp, some far in to the "measurements or it didn't happen" camp, and many of us span the gamut in between.