Revel F228be

B&W CM10 is the equivalent of the current series 702 S3, which retail for $7,000 a pair right now. I used to own both CM10 S1 then the Revel F228Be. Yes, I think the Revel sounded a bit better overall, certainly different, but not sure if it is a big upgrade from your CM10, assuming they are still in good working condition. IMO

The room is 50% of the sound, make sure part of your budget goes into treating your room.

Agreed.

Finally if you have a local dealer try comparing an electrostaic like the Martin Logan Classic ESP 9, a classic like the Klipsch Cornwall, and then something known for extreme accuracy like the ATC SCM40.

I would take the Revel over any of the above but..........................

When you compare speakers that are very different you will hopefully learn which is suited for your taste.

............ this is good advice.

I personally would buy something better than the Rotel.  You already have nice speakers, work on your electronics for better system synergy. 

I am a proud owner of a pair of Revel Performa F228be, and while I haven’t heard the variety of speakers that many on this board have, I can tell you they are a wonderful pair of speakers----crystal clear mid-range and highs, great imaging/soundstage, and great grip. I added a Rythmik F12se sub to improve the low-end, but I can predict with confidence that you’ll be impressed with the Revels.

I don't know much about the 7-8K range 9 (used). A lot of incredible speakers under 5K. Revel is a great value, high quality low-ish price but far from the most musical.