Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch

csmgolf

The Wavetouch compared to the original file did not sound alike. The Wavetouch sounded like a 12 year old boy before puberty. The original file sounded like a 30 year old man that has actual bass in his voice. If threadbare and thin is natural sounding to you, great.

I agree that the original music has 30 y o man voice with weight. It will be nice if any audio system recreates that voice perfectly. I posted WT is closest to the orig music and WT is natural sound like the orig music. I didn’t post they are alike. We can only try to get close to the orig music.

Like everyone, I think M3 sounds great and better than many $mil sound systems. However, I still think WT is the most closest to that voice. There are flesh, bones, and focus like real music in WT sounds to my ears. You will get it if you listen WT few times.

How do you know whose ears hurt here? I think maybe Arafiq has it right. You asked for opinion, and then didn’t get the praise you felt like you deserved.

Your audio system is natural sound and your non-a’phile friends are not hurt. I respect that.

Yes. I asked your opinion and thanks to you from my heart. I think I deserve some credit for what I am doing for a’phles and audio industry, but I am not disappointed by you and Arafig’s feedback since I get many positive ones too. In fact, you and Arafig are very nice. I won’t show what I get from my competitions. Alex/Wavetouch

Even though this is basically meaningless (recorded in different rooms using different recording equipment then listening on a completely unrelated speaker or headphone) I will say the Borreson sounds the best by a mile. Not saying the WT sound bad or good in real life but from this video I thought it was very much lacking body and sounded tipped up. 

mofojo

I will say the Borreson sounds the best by a mile. Not saying the WT sound bad or good in real life but from this video I thought it was very much lacking body and sounded tipped up. 

I respect your opinion. With different ears and you been hearing larger woofers, WT sound can be lacking body. My idea in speaker design is an accuracy. I did put more bass in WT, but I liked the less bass WT better. I decide to stay with the reference... the original music.

Both orig music and WT sounds are very much similar than with M3 sound. With all due respect, I am guessing if WT sound lacking body to your ears at the time, the orig music sound might be lacking body too to your ears. However, the orig music is the true ref and the sound to beat for any reproduction audio. Anything lots more sound than the true ref is a coloration or distortion. 

M3 sounds so good/powerful that it draws listeners right into its sound domain quickly and doesn't let go easily. With all due respect, your ears could be in un-natural sound hearing mode after hearing M3.  Alex/Wavetouch

@mihorn would love to see you at  LoneStarAudiofest.com June 2, 3, 4

you only pay for the cost of the room.