How do you assess a DAC?


I've currently got an Audiolab M-Dac+ and am now going to add a streamer to my system, a lot of which have inbuilt DACs. I'd like to know whether the DAC in the streamers, such as the iFi NEO stream and others I'm considering, is going to be better than my Audiolab, in which case I'd spend a bit more for an "upgrade" and sell on my DAC.

Is it a matter of taste or can I compare certain specs to get an answer?

side22olto

I have a separate DAC and streamer. I have found that a simple Bluesound Node 2 can be made to sound much better .. paired with a better DAC. At this time my DAC cost me 4x more than the Node 2. But I have upgraded my DAC three times and with each more sophisticated DAC the sound improved. I think If I were to spend north of $2500 on the streamer and north of $2000 on the DAC I could get better sound but I am not willing to do that..... mostly because i like the BluOS platform and I don't want to spend extra cash. I am at about $2800 now...

Thanks again to everyone who left helpful advice, I’ve now settled on an Auralic Aries G1.1 with a plan to potentially upgrade my Audiolab M-DAC+ in the future to something like a chord.

Enjoy. I use an Innuous Zenith Mki( got a super deal on demo model). Recently upgraded to a Lab 12 Ref DAC (R2R). Very pleasnt sound. 

Digital to analogue converters are so subjective.  I have a few inexpensive Dac's (Schiit Modius AKM4493, ifi  Zen Dac Signature original version).  I also own an older Audio By Van Alstine  Insight Multibit dac from the late 2000's that would retail for about $1200 in the present day. 

I find that each of these components sound good to me in the systems I use them in.    I have never owned any  mega buck dac's, so I really can't say based on my own experience, if their price is justified or not.  I do know that I have often preferred the sound of audio equipment that does not test as well objectively as some of their counterparts.  

I have heard several of the mass produced inexpensive offerings from China, and find them to be less than involving to listen to.  However, I have read some very positive  reviews on some of the more expensive gear offered by companies such as Line Magnetic. 

It seems that the best audio components are designed with both objective and subjective goals.  I remember reading a comment sometime ago in reference to an audio manufacturer, that compared audio design to creating a gourmet food recipe.

The inference was that this manufacturer had a gift for voicing their audio products.  And likened this person to a chef who created their gourmet meals with just the right amount of ingredients to obtain the exact flavor they were  looking for.  Or in the case of an audio component,  the specific sound that the audio designer was looking to create.  

It would seem that the best audio designers use this concept,  and in doing so pay more attention to how a component sounds than how it performs on a bench test.