"Too much gain"? (Cary SLP05 question)


A few days or so ago, someone had revived an old Cary SLP 05 thread, and common to that discussion seemed to be the subject of too much gain. 

My first question is:  does compensating for too much gain by simply adjusting the volume knob knob down degrade the sonic quality?

My second (2 part) question relates to this quote from one of the replies in that thread:

 A quick note to Pass Labs and they suggested a pair of Rothwell 10db balanced attenuators into the amp’s inputs.

What exactly do balanced attenuators do to resolve this issue, and if placed between the preamp and the amp, would they degrade the signal path & therefore the sonic result out of the speakers?

I am a relatively new owner/operator of a SLP05 and it is in front of one of the earlier Cary V12s.  I did find those balanced attenuators on ebay for (I think I remember them being) $89 a pair, which I find totally doable.  I am lsitening in a (very) near field room right now, and it seem as if I do have a lot of gain.  Generally the big knob is on 9 o'clock plus or minus a little bit depending upon the source material I am listening to.  I am using the balanced ins and outs to & from my SLP05 and I have been given to understand that using RCAs would reduce the gain somewhat.  I do have some RCAs (I am presently using Kimber Silver Streak balanced interconnects) but my collection of spare RCAs is Kimber PBJ and Monsters. 

For $89 should I try putting a pair of those  of Rothwell 10db balanced attenuators into the balanced amp’s inputs?

 

immatthewj

I don’t own any Cary gear so can’t comment on that aspect of this thread. But I surely do know about gain problems in my main desktop system. I’ve wrestled with excessive gain in this system for years, always with the same symptoms: the main preamp volume pot has only a few degrees of play at the lower/left end of its rotation, such that the lowest volume to the highest volume are adjusted only from, for example, 7:30 on the dial (the end of counterclockwise rotation) up to perhaps 8:30 or 9 on the dial for the very loudest volume desired. Not only does this deprive me of the ability to fine-tune volume easily and repeatably; but it also risks the audibility of any channel-tracking non-linearity in any give volume pot.

This situation only got worse when I went from a delta-sigma DAC with 1.9 volts output single-ended; to a NOS/R2R DAC with 2.5 volts output; and most recently, to a NOS/R2R DAC with 3.0 volts output. I got through this because the preamp/headphone amp I’ve been using, the Violectric V281, has very granular and effect gain controls, separate for the line-out vs headphone output. With both controls set at -12 dB, things have been fine, and the V281’s range of usable rotatotion of the big stepped volume pot is ~9:00 (lowest volume) to ~1:30 (highest).

Then 2 weeks ago I got a new headphone amp/preamp that I burned in and want to hear as the main system preamp/headphone amp, in order to give the overworked V281 a rest. Unfortunately, this new unit (Kinki Audio Vision THR-1) represents a "perfect storm" of excessive gain:

  • It has rather extreme power (28 wpc @8 ohms down to 1.3 wpc @600 ohms). It’s really an integrated amp that lacks speaker taps
  • But it has no low/medium/high gain setting. What you get is the full native gain of the unit on all downstream sources
  • As a result, this amp is virtually unusable in my system for use as intended.
  • But I know from burnin listening that it sounds wonderful and suits my tastes in every way.

So what to do?

First, I experimented with inserting a very good sounding, transformer-based passive volume controller between the DAC and this new amp. Doing so is a real PITA (additional run of interconnect; place 2 new units on crowded desktop instead of just 1), but with its volume pot set to -10 dB, it does exactly what I want: the volume pot of the new amp now can be used from ~9:00 to 2:00 on the dial, lowest to highest volume, which is ideal for me.

Before this thread, I’d never heard of Rothwell attenuators, though I had heard of cheaper ones that get very dicey/up-and-down user reviews, with too many comments talking about loss of transparency and dynamics. Reviews and user comments for the Rothwell attenuators are far more positive. So I just ordered a pair of 10 dB attenuators as a way to simplify my new system.

My overall point here is the gain problems are totally real, Cary gear or no Cary gear. When you have gain problems, they can't simply be resolved by using the volume pot at the lowest few degrees of rotation. That’s usually produces sonically sub-par results, plus is borderline-impossible to live with, day to day.

@docroasty, I've never heard any Cary electronics. I've used the Rothwell attenuators (single-ended, rated @-10 dB) only on the Kinki Studio THR-1 headphone amp/preamp. In that application, the Rothwells did nothing I could detect to the overall sound, beyond lowering the gain somewhat (as intended).

 

I'd have to hear them in a larger 2-channel system to dial in their transparent. But in in my pretty resolving, high quality desktop system, they did exactly what they're advertised to do and seemed quite transparent.

@desktopguy ah thanks man. I read your previous post too fast. appreciate the reply though. I just ordered a set of Rothwell attenuators, so hopefully they'll do the trick.