Subwoofer

@jpwarren58 , If you try adding just one subwoofer to your current situation you will be very unhappy with the results. I suggest you wait until your circumstances improve. At any rate adding just one sub is never a good idea, Two is the minimum. 

Mijostyn is right for me...

I added ONE sub few years ago, because so good was the Mission Cyrus in the bass  they are not  good up to under 45 hertz and organ music goes under...

I disconnected it the same day and sold it... ( Kreisel k9  sub )

integrating subs is a job of his own...

@jpwarren58 , If you try adding just one subwoofer to your current situation you will be very unhappy with the results. I suggest you wait until your circumstances improve. At any rate adding just one sub is never a good idea, Two is the minimum.

You left out the single BEST brand of subs to consider for two channel: REL. Why? Is a budgetary constraint? 

I have two Rythmik subs and worked on a few areas for placement. Maybe you can have two quality subwoofers together facing out and place a tabletop on them. Make them a coffee table.  Might be a great conversation piece, Thinking out loud....

You left out the single BEST brand of subs to consider for two channel: REL.

Once I would have agreed. In twenty years, I’ve yet to hear decent demo of a REL product, even in $100k systems.

IMO, REL gave up engineering for bling. Most of their line lacks adequate controls to integrate properly.

Far too many conflate more with better.