2. vintage
  3. 184920-93005

What's up with the price of Vintage equipment?

The reason I am asking is, I sold stereo equipment in the 1970's and 1980's and some of the stuff I see selling for big bucks today were not well thought of during the 70's and 80's and lots of it sounded pretty mediocre (think Class D amps with amazingly low specs like .00007% distortion or other such nonsense). I won't get into brand names, but just by the era you should be able to tell. 

As a quick aside, it annoys the hell out of me that I'm at an age that 1970's and 1980's equipment is considered Vintage. Was it really that long ago? Rats.

Anyway, again there were some really good sounding stuff back then, and the price today may be high, but it's still good sounding stuff and worth it. But I see prices today for 40-60 year old equipment that I sold back then because it was heavily advertised, popular/known name and design (and sometimes gave me a good commission), but not because it sounded good. 

So I am assuming some of this high price vintage stuff is due only to nostalgia (both in looks and sound) and collecting fun, not for listening compared to today's stuff.

I'm open to hearing other opinions, especially from someone who does like vintage (mostly 1970-80's) stuff, listens to it, and what brands they have. 

 

128x128deadhead1000
elliottbnewcombjr
5,197 posts
 

I just checked the price of the Vintage stuff I bought since 2019.

They all went up in price after I bought mine, many quite a bit, now they have dropped down to what I paid in 2019, 2020.

McIntosh mx110z Tube Preamp/Tuner

Mitsubishi Vertical TT LT-5V

Acoustic Research AR-2ax

Sony SACD/CD xa5400 ES

Cayin A88T tube amp

grislybutter
2,305 posts
 

I bought a Marantz receiver from 1974 12 years ago for $200, sold it for $900 last year. And the going rate is really $1500. Can you buy a younger, better amp for $900 today? Probably...

It did sound incredible in a mid-fi setup. And nothing beats the looks. Today’s audio gear is very hard to look at. Even the prettier ones are nowhere near the aesthetic value of the old amps.

mapman's avatar
mapman
21,860 posts
 

Most cannot compare to modern sound wise.   It’s a looks and nostalgia thing mostly.  In some cases features like tone controls might have appeal. 

deadhead1000's avatar
deadhead1000 OP
709 posts
 

@jasonbourne71 

I'd rather not say to be honest, only because a while back I mentioned how I did not like the sound of a piece of equipment that I had actually owned for many years. I didn't trash it, I just said I didn't care for it. Someone just went ballistic that I didn't like the sound of that brand of amp. I even tried to reason with him, saying it was my own experience and opinion,  and he just sent more insults. I don't need anyone else saying "X is better then Y and you're stupid to think otherwise."

By the way, I owned a Marantz 2235 with Advent speakers and loved it. But I also brought them new in the 70's. Maybe I can safely say there are much better speakers out there now then the Large Advents from the 70's??? 

 

mapman's avatar
mapman
21,860 posts
 

Having heard and sold many large Advents back in the day at Tech Hifi, many including myself preferred Ohm model Ls to the Advents. Those were designed specifically to take on the Advents but in a smaller package.

I still have my Ohm Ls that I refurbed myself a few years back. Also have newer Ohm Walsh and KEFs. Both are better. Have also owned Magnepan, B&W, Boston and others. Each were at least 1 up on the old Advents.

You can still buy upgrades for ohm Ls and most every other Ohm model ever sold since the early 70s. The upgrades take each up several levels to compete better with other more modern designs.

I’m sure armed with the right smarts one could take old Large Advents to a higher level these days as well.

 

Yes quality of home sound has advanced considerably over the last 50 years or so. Should not come as a surprise.

 

More to discover