soix could be right. maybe my hearing is bad. I'm 51 now, and have listened to lots of loud rock and roll since my teens. You can make the argument an eq is an extra path in the chain. But you can also use an equalizer or bass/treble to adjust for the room. I WOULD NEVER BUY SOMETHING WITHOUT IT. You are limited to 1 sound and that's it. Different sources (vinyl, cd, streamer) can all have a different sound profile, and one may want to adjust for that. Maybe the high end makers don't put it in cuz it saves them money too. I don't want this to turn into a pissing match. But if you bought something with an eqalizer. Would you just leave it in 1 setting for life, cuz it's the most accurate??
Do my ears deceive me??
The money is in the bank, thinking of upgrading speakers, but everything I demo is no better or worse than what I have. Willing to spend up to $6,000. Upgraditis?? My main system is Mcintosh MX 134 that I bought in 2003, with a pair of Focal 836v's and a Parasound 5250 (250w/channel) amp I bought around 2012. I either blew the tweeters or crossover on my 836's, so they are in for repair. Since I've owned them for 10 years, I was considering new speakers. The blades are way more than I would spend, but I also demoed the Kef R11s, Martin Logan xtf 200's, Mcintosh XR 100s, and B&W 703 S3.
None of them sounded better than what I'm hearing right now from my BP 2006s. Would I really need to demo them in my room to make a fair comparison?? Or are speakers just not much better than they were 20 years ago? I know I love detail, and tend to lean towards aluminum tweeters. I pretty much only listen to classic rock and roll. Of all I demoed, I really like the B&W 706s. They sounded much brighter/cleaner than the others. But they had the reciever set up so I couldn't adjust the treble/bass. I love a V equalizer curve, and bump up the bass and treble a bit on my home/car systems. Maybe I just have the good luck of prefering cheaper speakers.
- ...
- 79 posts total
- 79 posts total