Did Amir Change Your Mind About Anything?


It’s easy to make snide remarks like “yes- I do the opposite of what he says.”  And in some respects I agree, but if you do that, this is just going to be taken down. So I’m asking a serious question. Has ASR actually changed your opinion on anything?  For me, I would say 2 things. I am a conservatory-trained musician and I do trust my ears. But ASR has reminded me to double check my opinions on a piece of gear to make sure I’m not imagining improvements. Not to get into double blind testing, but just to keep in mind that the brain can be fooled and make doubly sure that I’m hearing what I think I’m hearing. The second is power conditioning. I went from an expensive box back to my wiremold and I really don’t think I can hear a difference. I think that now that I understand the engineering behind AC use in an audio component, I am not convinced that power conditioning affects the component output. I think. 
So please resist the urge to pile on. I think this could be a worthwhile discussion if that’s possible anymore. I hope it is. 

chayro

I have zero issues with measurements based music listening & enjoyment as a hobby, but phrases like this, from the Master’s mouth is the problem with all this GREAT debate and bickering:

None of you bother to eliminate sources of bias and errors in your listening tests before claiming you hear this and that. 

People should be allowed to express their opinion on any audio gear or system openly and without fearing backlash from the measurements crowd, always trigger happy to spoil the party by throwing & yelling “proof” in their face. 
 

also, phrases like this:

Until this lesson is learned, you will never know the audio truth and wind up chasing ghosts.

Everything with “you don’t know the truth”, or “I show you the truth”, or “only I can fix this” has an element that I don’t particularly perceive as scientific or even delusional. God like.

 

 

@painter24 "

At the end of the day, when it comes down to it, when I or anyone else switches on their system and presses play, it becomes an entirely subjective activity; after all, for me anyway it's about the music and love/passion for music. If it sounds good/I enjoy the presentation my system gives me, nothing else matters - not measurements, cost, brand, none of it. I want to get lost in the music, end of.

If the enjoyment of music is distilled down into a debatable set of measurements, or reduced to pure scientific theory, the soul of music is dead."

 

Well said +1

You put in my mouth what i never said,,,

It seems extremists in subjective and objective schools will never understand anything out of their blindness spot...

I ONLY said what i said, not that my three past dac sounded the same...

I mean  the difference which are there is not huge and does not compare to other embeddings controls especially acoustic one...

I said confirming Amir on this point that dac technology is mature technology and we can have very good dac at low price... Once this is said i LISTEN to deetermine my choice or the need for a change...

 

 

@Mahgister

"For example in dac... Dac is a mature technology, and we can now afford a very good one at relatively low price..."

See, this is where the comment breaks down. You can get a very good measuring one, but it may not sound that good. However ASR minions will argue that all Dacs that measure the same sound the same.

Your post is an example of despise that innerve everybody here...

You talk about what "neutrinos" coming from a cable? And you mock subjectivist hearing them...

It is very easy to mock subjectivist extremist views...

I dont like extremist of the subjectivist or objectivist kind...

Why ?

Because they focus on gear "magical " properties , MEASURED OR NOT....

The measuring crowd argue against the listening crowds that some qualitative phenomena cannot be there and the other side insulted claim and argue they are there...

Myself i dont focus on the GEAR....As this two sides did...

Audio is about acoustic and psycho-acoustic AT THE END...

Then i was able to tune my room to my likings with a result so astonishing that i learned this fact : there is no relation between before and after...

Is my small room could be deemed PERFECT acoustically like a great acoustic Hall designed by a pro? no...

Is my small room designed and tuned for my ears and biases ? Yes

Small room acoustic is not great Hall acoustic...( For example time and timing play in a different way for the ears reverberation can be used positively Etc )

i then learned why subjectivist and objectivist miss the boat in their respective living room...

In audio the most important component is a dedicated acoustic room... This is my truth... And for the immature dude who will say that my hearing is not perfect, i will answer for sure my hearing is not perfect ...But i was able to tune 100 Helmholtz resonators around my room distributed on critical spot by ears , and i did it in my imperfect way as a piano tuner tune a piano... It takes me 1 complete year of fun each day... End results : extraordinary at NO COST...It is not perfect precisely because my ears is not perfect but for me it was way better than no acoustic tuning ... There is NO COMPARISON ON ANY ACOUSTIC FACTORS between before and after..

The lesson : the gear is SECONDARY....

The hearing biases are not there to be ELIMINATED in the small owner’s room  but to be used positively  AS A SET OF  BIASES TOOL to tune the room for the owner ears...This room is not a HALL for the crowds it is for me...( great hall acoustic is not small room acoustic, the same acoustic principles are used in a different way here)

if someone dont want to study basic acoustics and learned a lot by experiments; i recommend Dr. Choeri BACCH filters... It will be the same as my room but on a level of perfection reducing it to nothing to be compared.... My imperfect  ears cannot beat DSP wisely used in a revolutionary psycho-acoustic design...

As in my room the sound from speakers ( or from your headphone) will be there in 3-D perfectly localized without timbre degradation... A feat i can only grossly and imperfctly approximate in my small room...

I am neither a subjectivist nor an objectivist extremist IDEOLOGUE quarelling as childs ...

i dont focus on gear, measured or not, i focus on acoustic...

The key to the best world system is acoustic and psycho-acoustic ...Ask Dr. Choueri... He dont mind the brand name of speakers, amplifier or turntable or Dac and their measures or their reviews...What matters first and last is the properties of the ears/brain experience as described in psycho-acoustic, or as used in an imperfect way in your room...Pick any good basic system and put it on his top level with acoustic... This is the way...I dont mind if you choose it by ears or by the numbers...I dont mind extremists...

 

Yeah but what about the neutrinos? Nobody checks for them. I have a cable with special shielding .....and I’m starting a go fund me account......

They will be called No trino cables.

So mahgister,  I guess that you will not helping my go fund me account to help develop the "No trino" cables?

What if  told you that neutrinos cannot be measured?  Let's see Amir shoot that one down!   It's a foolproof scam, I mean plan.  

   😄

 

I'm joking.