Did Amir Change Your Mind About Anything?


It’s easy to make snide remarks like “yes- I do the opposite of what he says.”  And in some respects I agree, but if you do that, this is just going to be taken down. So I’m asking a serious question. Has ASR actually changed your opinion on anything?  For me, I would say 2 things. I am a conservatory-trained musician and I do trust my ears. But ASR has reminded me to double check my opinions on a piece of gear to make sure I’m not imagining improvements. Not to get into double blind testing, but just to keep in mind that the brain can be fooled and make doubly sure that I’m hearing what I think I’m hearing. The second is power conditioning. I went from an expensive box back to my wiremold and I really don’t think I can hear a difference. I think that now that I understand the engineering behind AC use in an audio component, I am not convinced that power conditioning affects the component output. I think. 
So please resist the urge to pile on. I think this could be a worthwhile discussion if that’s possible anymore. I hope it is. 

chayro

that so many on here are so hostile to measurements is very strange to me, but I understand that sometimes defending our own perceptions is more important especially if we have big $$ invested... and I also am well aware that one can argue that our perceptions ARE our own personal reality, so...

it is also very strange that people complain about hostility on Amir’s site and yet are so hostile on THIS site.

sigh.

@curtdr This thread exists and in such a prolific form for a reason. I am not entirely sure why but there is a lot of history there. If Amir would just answer some basic questions, people wouldnt be so frustrated, including myself. 

"Amir, you kicked me off your "Audio Science" forum for being "too objective", because I insisted only valid listening tests mattered, not "SINAD" and "ETC" many of your cult worship. "

As your language here quite demonstrates, we banned you from ASR due to being the most obnoxious person I know on these forums.  Heaven knows how many people you have alienated from audio science with your hostile posting and attitude which conveying next to no knowledge. 

The above, and refusal to practice anything you preach to subjectivists was the reason we let you go.  When I asked you for blind tests of your speakers, your tap dance would have earned you a seat at Julliard.  Here is quick example:

 https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/what-do-listeners-prefer-for-small-room-acoustics.286/post-9179

"

amirm said:

Last I checked you [AJ/soundfield] don't do any blind acoustic tests either.

[AJ/Soundfiled:] For what conflicts with what objective evidence exactly Amir? What am I to blind test for specifically? Red Herrings?

As if that were not enough, you have now turned into speaker salesman looking to protect your pocketbook by appease to this membership. In a thread where people are attacking audio science, blind testing, engineering, etc. you are not only completely silent, but rather have a fight with me.  I say your transition to subjectivity is complete.  Thank heavens as we don't remotely want someone this miserable in our camp.

I once asked JJ (my chief audio architect and one of audio luminaries) about people like you.  He made this wise statement: "an unreasonable advocate is worst of both worlds!"   

It's pretty arrogant to think we know all there is to know about electromagnetism.