Exactly! There was a perfect opportunity to clearly state that most of your measurements fall well below audibility thresholds AND, even if they are perceptible, there is no clear evidence one is preferred over another.
And how do you know if some product falls in the "most" category or the other? By measuring!!! You don't just sniff the box, look at the price or reputation and decide that. You measure. Then you know.
Of course you are just waiving your hand on that "most" bit. You have no background in psychoacousts, measurements or even electronic design. You have never participated in a single blind test presented to you. So what you are spitting out are just claims.
Here is the good news though: superlative measured results cost next to nothing. So if you are purchasing something new, there is no reason to settle for "just enough fidelity." You can get to what I call provably transparent. There, we compare the measurements to threshold of hearing (which is determined by listening tests). If the equipment has less noise and distortion than this, then those factors are simply not in play and we can prove it!
The moment you go above that level, then it becomes shades of gray which requires interpretation. A skill that our soundfield friend does not remotely have.
You do ZERO valid listening tests. Yet you not only "Rank', but routinely "Not recommend" products based solely on measurements with zero listening test correlation.
I have post numerous blind tests that I have passed. We ask people to run blind, level matched tests. And when they do, backed by training and skill they have, across countless such challenges, you jump up and down claiming they must have cheated. Well, you are dead wrong and have no proof of it. In the video I post on listener training, I actually explained how I passed Archimago high res challenge. Ah, you don't like the fact that I knew what impairment to look for. Well, that is how a proper listening test is done. We want listeners to know what to listen for. We don't want to stick our head in the sand by removing that skill and hoping to get negative outcome, the reality be damned.
Yes, it is inconvenient for likes of you to see someone like me disprove your ideas of inaudibility. Tough. Next time learn the topic itself and not just repeat talking points that nothing can sound better than something else.
Finally, I looked at your website. There is no measurements of any speakers except for one random one with no documentation. Surely you don't claim that speaker measurements are of no use, are you? You are not that deep into subjectivity, are you?
Then I saw this bit of absurdity on your home page:
"Our products reflect the philosophy that loudspeakers should strive to sound like the real thing. "Hi Fidelity" once meant exactly that. If you know what live acoustic music sounds like, you will appreciate our products."
Oh really? How does a speaker convert a microphone recorded content into the sound of the real thing? Magic? You have some scientific research to link to that states anything remotely like this? Or is it that when it comes to selling speakers, you are just as bad as the next guy in ignoring audio science and engineering?