Did Amir Change Your Mind About Anything?

I wonder, if ASR website (Amir Science Review) was so popular, beating every single audio forum & site, including Stereophile, by multiple TIMES, why the owner of that site, the honorable Amir His Majesty, spend so much time here?

Because ASR is more than me: it includes tens of thousands of your fellow audiophiles who are discussing audio topics on their own without me.  I do my part to post my near daily reviews and folks go on discussing them and other topics of interest.  You can read my audio review from last night.  Or you can hang around here and continue to show interest in what we are discussing...

@mahgister 

All audio design is based on Fourier tools

What? We design circuits based on knowledge of electronics, not Fourier "tools."  Fourier principles are used in such things as lossy audio compression but have no role in design of say, an analog amplifier.

@mahgister 

But for Van Maanen some other aspects of his design are inspire4d by his hearing theory ideas... Then he used music real test  also and very importantly..

Our job is to verify his claims there.  After all, every designer uses music to check out what they have built.  And they all claimed to be informed as such in their designs.  We as consumers are left to figure out who is right in this and who is not.

I have repeatedly asked you to tell me about nature of Van Maanans music testing.  You don't have any to offer.  And he has not seen fit to provide such proof either.  There is nothing scientific about that.  We have classic audio marketing, that's all.

You read me wrong...

i trust that Van Maanen is competent in audio design... As i know that you are competent in your specs review...

but my point citing Van Maanen is because he was INSPIRED by the non linear aspect of hearing and the time dependant domain where the act of hearing take place ... He used this in his tought experiment and real experiment with his design..

But so competent he could be i have no idea about the quality of his design...

I used it to complement my point about the ecological hearing theory...Van Maanen is conscious of that... You have heard many more high end components than me, buy one and review it... I will love that... 😊

Test yourself his design and i will read your review...i will never be able to buy his product anyway...😊

I dont belive in the Van Maanen design theory...I cannot evaluate it by listening anyway... And i am not competent in amplifier design... BUT I KNOW THAT VAN MAANEN IS RIGHT about hearing theory and the way the ears process sound in relation to sound source.. this is why i read it...

There is mystery when you state a theory you have believed with no evidence in reality. You have not presented any data points related to performance of audio amplifiers. You just want us to read a few lines of text written by a company designer. So no, it is not evident in the least.

@mahgister 

But i disagree wi5th you vabout the importance of hearing theory and listening test...I disagree with the idea that we can predict more than the behaviour of the electronic compobnents but also their sound qualities... Sound qualities is a set...In this set each sonic character production cannot be predicted as human hearings will perceive it and judged it... 

You can disagree but you need to prove it.  You can't keep repeating the same research which says nothing whatsoever about "sonic qualities" of an amplifier.