The perfect satellite/subwoofer system ...
...is essentially a 4-way system and preferably fully active.
Bear with me.
The original satellite/subwoofer systems were often 2-way satellites with a subwoofer, or a 3-way system. This caused a number of problems which I think have overall contributed negatively to their acceptance in the modern day audio world. Either the satellites were too small, and had a high crossover to the subwoofer or they used larger mid-woofers and then the the tweeter crossover was too low, again limiting the dynamic range of the system as a whole.
A perfect satellite/subwoofer system has to have lots of dynamic range in the satellite and the subwoofer along with excellent vertical and horizontal dispersion. The 2-way + sub is a compromise.
Also, by going active we can achieve something we almost never see in passive speakers:
Perfect 4th order filters.
That gives us excellent vertical and horizontal dispersion (assuming the right size drivers).
The solution is, perhaps, using a 3-way satellite system with 4th order (electro + acoustical) filters, and an expected -3 dB point of ~ 80 Hz (the THX standard). As part of this equation it also means the 3-way ends in an 8 or 10" woofer, which being bandwidth limited is going to have excess dynamic range.
Yes, I’m bored, and yes I’m hoping to take some wind out of the discussion about science vs. A’gon. :D