The thing that intrigues me is that the High-End crowd would rather endorse this kind of review :
"The key observation about the effect of five Blackbody v2s on duty in my room narrows down to the way how the two used speaker sets rendered space there. The entire view grew a touch more anchored and denser in both cases, but higher humidity was the most obvious change. The air in-between key sound sources felt rich and fragrant just like before a storm. The overall vibe was less dry and chiseled. Instrumental and vocal shapes struck me as more moist and bloomier than before, while their outlines became somewhat thicker. Sound audibly leaned towards the extra color, boldness and aroma rather than twitchiness, sparks, elasticity and high contrast. Increased relaxation and less prickly incisiveness followed. Considering all this, Blackbody V2 was groomed to fit the usual LessLoss noise-killing profile indeed, so enjoyably familiar. The fact that the theory behind it raises quite a few eyebrows doesn’t change that."
Link to review
The above review from the HiFi Knights website to me is utter nonsense. Not only is it just a deluge of meaningless superlatives. The possibility of some metal discs occupying the same room as your sound equipment creating audible effects is preposterous. This should be obvious to any rational person. However, the Audiophile class just seems to eat up this type of subjective "testing". Not only that, they will purchase these types of devices and "hear" the effects.
I have participated in a few HiFi and Audiophile forums and always found that there is a cadre of individuals who are prepared to hate someone offering technical advice on audio equipment as it contradicts their world view. The example above of Amirs measurements of the Neumann monitors is exactly the type of information I would want prior to purchasing any (costly) audio product. The last thing I would consider is purchasing a product based on someone using words like "humidity" or "bloomier" to describe it.