Do NOT Blow Your Entire Budget on Two Channel Audio

@mahgister Thanks for the information on the Bacch filter. Just watched a few interesting videos on the technology and the product. I believe you may be correct Mahgister, depending on what they can get the price of the unit down to when in full production it looks like it could make Dolby Atmos the new MQA.

BACCH has really dominated the market in the 8 years it has existed. Totally dominant. Probably at least a few hundred people have heard of it.

It is a good technology for one person, calibrated for that one person, in one specific environment. No listening parties. No trade shows with more than one person in a room. No listening with your spouse, family or friends. That limited market means it will always be a fringe product and hard to justify for any content creators.

If I were them I would ditch their present business model and work on only the ear calibration for headphones. Way bigger market. Stupid to compete with ATMOS and similar. They won’t just lose. They already lost. Ship has sailed. Integrate with them and make them better for the headphone crowd.

@fittebd you think most music available will work? Heck no. It would all need to be remixed. Who is going to do that for such a small market? Almost no one. The only steady stream of music that could be adapted automatically would be ATMOS.

@fittebd

For the poster that says their tuned 2 channel system is just as good as a 5.1 has not listened to a proper system

I disagree, you never know what mix you will prefer. I have EJ in two ch, 5.1, and atmos. I have him in lossy spotify, redbook CD, MQA and 24/192 hirez.

Having a 5.1 system you can choose, having only stereo you get what you get.

I think the bigger point is you can have both.

+10!! Agree

Welcome to EVERY TOPIC ON EVERY AUDIO FORUM!!!

What did you do @kota1 ?  Did you upset someone annointed?  We covered Toole and room treatments in the Amir bashing thread. Toole has not done much research on room acoustics in real rooms and critical listening. He did some basic preference work, limited dataset, and similar limited dataset in an anechoic chamber. Nothing for multichannel either. Drawing any complex conclusions (like Amir did) is flawed. No one is forcing anyone to do anything. @kota1 is excited. At least he is excited about something real.

Getting so wrapped up in it to the point where one says "Toole has a room like mine", when it’s the other way ’round, and posting shots of recording studios that one has copied doesn’t make them one of the big boys of audio but just someone who now has invested so heavily into it he needs to have validation in his choices by forcing them on others as there’s comfort in conformity and herd mentality.

Last year I and teenage daughters moved into a newly built house with the good fortune that my wife waited to move in ten months later. I immediately put together a Sony/Anthem/Emotiva/Klipsch/Hsu 11.1 Atmos theater where family members primarily watch movies, Korean/Japanese Dramas and YouTube. The next nine months I carefully put together a two channel room. I have enjoyed watching concerts in the theater room and do enjoy watching dance/music performances, but prefer listening to most music in my two channel room. I must admit that I would never be able to afford an 11.1 Atmos system which was the equal of my two channel system. It never occurred to me to listen to music without video in the theater room, but then again I consider my theater room components to be good, but not nearly as satisfying without the video. I should admit that Magic Dragons performance of Arcane’s opening song “Enemy” is incredibly in 11.1 Atmos.

To summarize, I can’t afford theater room component which perform at the same level as my two channel room.