Can't get Acoustic Zen Adagios to sound smooth

To Mmeysarosh, Your comment exactly described what I am hearing and have heard over the last 4 years. It is not been painful, just overall disappointing.

At the same time, let me say. the Adagios provide a wonderful accuracy in the mid-range. However, the music DOES NOT sound either real, natural,or organic The few Chesky CD's, I own in many ways show what the speaker is capable. Dynamic range is off the scope. Nevertheless,I have ran out of solutions, and there are so many(if not too many) aspects that factor into good, convincing, hold the listener's attention...sound.

Interestingly,,another member shares the same opinion as Mmyersarosh, that any tweak will make only a marginal difference. Nevertheless, I will try Soix and Almarg advice of changing the output tubes of the Rogue Sphinx hybrid integrated amp. Rogue suggested the Mullards 12AUL which are available on Generalex Gold Lion site. According to the tech at Rogue, this should smooth out the top end with out rounding it off.

The recently acquired "used" Ayre CX-7E is a given in the system, and I was going to have it upgraded to the "mp" version which is the most current design. FOR THE RECORD, I was going to have this done to bring the player to peak performance, and not as a potential cure for the hard edgy sound when playing CD's. This was evident to vary degrees with my former Rega Apollo. Now, I may just hold off until I have these other issues resolved.

Nevertheless, thanks to all those who participated in this "beerhall" rumble.

I went through the same years ago with my Vandersteen 3 series, though in reverse as I found them too smooth. Wanted to like them more because of what they did well, but was never satisfied. Finally gave up, and been listening happily ever since.

Uh oh, Jl35. You've done it now. Shame on you......

I've found that most speaker lines may keep the same common thread over the years, however most that I listen to often change with the times or as new materials pop up in the tech sector.

I don't think you can take any companies amp from years ago and compare it to their offerings of today. I personally didn't like Vandersteen years ago, but love their high end line now. I didn't like Audio Quest years ago as a cable manufacturer, but now feel they are darn neutral. I haven't liked many of the top named speaker lines as they were too hot for me and they still are, however many do have better mids now, but are still no coherent.

Was speaking with a designer/engineer yesterday about something off topic, but as always it came back to audio and his views. He is a measurer and we talked about his experiences in the industry and all the snake oil BS that many companies use to sell their gear. Many, even in the industry don't know all the crap that happens behind the scenes or some of the claims companies make about their products or even themselves that are flat out BS.

He feels that all too often consumers just buy in hook line and sinker into this marketing stuff and then talk about it on the boards. In the past we spoke about it in meetings or as we visited stores. Too many don't really know what distortion sounds like as we've been told that it's 'open on top' or 'highly extended'. Much of that is a signal not being passed properly. Many of the very expensive, big name cables can't pass a simple square wave and most can't pass a signal with the proper time phase according to him. He quoted a bunch of names from physics and all (I don't pretend to be an engineer, but I understand concepts well).

I've never read a bad word about this maker/engineer and doubt I will. He will not publicly bad mouth anyone's components, but he does test things and tries anything he can to constantly upgrade his own products. He knows we all hear differently and respects that.

Tying this back into the original thread a bit more....
He said that trying to match cables is ridiculous. Cables upstream or downstream don't interact with each other. They only interact with the component they are attached to (my words, but I'm sure you all understand the point he's making). He said a cable either passes a signal properly or it doesn't. He had heard differences in some cables and the ones that have tested poorly in the 4 tests you use on a cable (see Bell Labs tests I think he said).to check it's properties are ones he just doesn't like. He did testing after listening.

He feels strongly (and knows that everyone has a different philosophy) that you need to buy the correct component and then get a neutral cable that has shielding. Mu metal has been one of the only complete ways to shield cables or components over the years and has been used in the cable and speaker industries.

If you don't like a speaker AFTER LISTENING TO IT IN THE PROPER ENVIRONMENT, then cross it off you list and move on. Some don't care about what sounds best, they care about more bass or more highs or only the mids.

Personally if I hadn't liked my system for 4 years I would go speak with a dealer I fully trusted or find one (I actually did that two years ago) and I'd start over.

I hope by now we all realize that you MUST listen to any companies new gear that you will be buying and stop living in the past or listening to BS hype about the product of the month. There is a high end store known nationally that is in business to make money. They always are changing lines. Why? Many reasons, however when speaking with an owner, he flat out said that they always need to carry what's on the next cover of that hot magazine as that's what sells. THAT statement made me think of the internet boards where words DO MATTER to a company........any company.

and NO the person wasn't Richard Vandersteen, although ironically this engineer LOVES his speakers and holds him in the highest regards and feels he's one of the few NO BS guys in the industry. That's why he may rub someone the wrong way, but at least he's not lying. Can't ask for much more than that IMHO.

Be careful Jl35, the Vandersteen Walkers are coming for you!