Do NOT Blow Your Entire Budget on Two Channel Audio


Yes, two channel audio is here, and is not going away. However, object based audio is delightful, widely available on Tidal and Apple Music, and should be in the listening room of every music lover on the planet, not just "audiophiles. If you plan to be a music fan a year from now start building your object based audio system today. You will need:

1) A receiver/processor capable of Dolby Atmos.

2) A subscription to Tidal or Apple music.

3) A Firestick, ATV, or Nvidia Shield.

4) A minimum of 7 timber matched speakers and a subwoofer.

Once you experienced stereo would you ever go back to only mono? No, you would build a system capable of either mono or stereo. Now that object based audio has arrived do the same thing. Build a system capable of mono, stereo, AND object based audio. When Elton John heard Rocket Man in an object based format for the first time why did he demand to convert his entire catalog to Atmos? If you don’t know, then you need to go listen to Rocket Man in a good Atmos setup ASAP.

So, take your budget, DIVERSIFY, and get a good Atmos capable receiver or processor. Object based audio is NOT last decades surround sound or home theater. It is for MUSIC first, if you need a recommendation on how to allocate your budget feel free to post a question. Most importantly, you don’t NEED two systems, one for music and one for movies. A good object based audio system can play two channel music just fine. A two channel system on the other hand can’t play object based audio without a proper processor or receiver.

Greg Penny talks mixing Rocket Man in Atmos.

https://youtu.be/ggzfcUKDqdo?feature=shared

 

kota1

All of this object based, immersive audio is firmly situated atop that 90 year old technology and wouldn't exist without it. You can't start with a clean slate just because you've figured out a way to extract even more money out of listeners with some better channel extraction techniques and massively hype the heck out of it.

The only way it can ever be construed as "high fidelity" is when the listener is completely unaware of sound emanating from other than directly in front of them, just like in real life. It's why none of the other, previous attempts failed to catch on: it's too fake sounding. Why anyone would want to hear the perspective of a chamber piece from inside the chamber group playing is way too weird for my tastes. 

So yes, it is all a matter of priorities, budget, preferences, tastes, etc. I've never been a lemming in the throes of flavor of the month and which cliff to merrily jump off of. It's gotten so that even hobbies like audio can become memes in and of themselves as we dumb down our culture.

All the best,
Nonoise

... the ill mannered carnival hyena that’s incapable of understanding technology returns ...

it's interesting that the two users advocating for this flash-bang technology share the same nasty, insulting arguments such as this ad hominem, the laziest of all logical fallacies.

Stereo versus atmos is like the childish discussion between turntables versus dac or between S.S. and tubes amp...

😁

Ignorance drive the wheel and "tastes"...

For me it is low cost /S.Q. ratio and acoustic...

Try science and read what say an acoustician : BACCH FILTERS....