DAC's from the past, are any of them really worth much today?

My main system for music listening is connected on only one point on the wall electrical plug with a recent dac ( Hidizs AP 80 pro) which i use as a bank and which is only battery powered ...It is a very clean dac ...

It contain a fraction of my many thousand music files ...

For my casual music listening all day exploring all my files i must use my active speakers , which i modify, in their acoustic corner , because it is where all my files are in a bank connected to the computer ...

i use an USB connection shielded with my homemade "golden plates" to my french battery dac TDA 1543 a minimalistic more than good dac Starting point systems, which is very organic and match more than well with M-Studio AV40 speakers...

The sound is so good that it beat all headphones for intimacy and details anmd imaging i ever listened to save my actual modified one the AKG K340 which beat them on timbre naturalness and bass (25 hertz/50 hertz)

Now my question is : why claiming that audiophile experience is impossible for a system connected to a computer ?... you may be right for almost all systems but there is exception ...My embeddings controls are so well done that upgrading appear ridiculous or too costly with my 700 bucks system... I compute that a real upgrade will cost me 15,000 for my speakers system ...Less for my headphone system because i cannot change my headphone nor my amplifier , they are optimized old unique design in the world with a SPEAKER-LIKE soundfield and natural timbre ...there exist no other hybrid as the K340 ...The Sansui alpha just beat the tube ZOTL amp i tried to upgrade it with ... synergy matter ...This is the lesson ...

Now my question how do you use 10,000 musical lossless files without a USB connection ?

I did not use cd for a decade and i transfered automatically all i had owned for a decade ...

Price tag dont define the sound quality of most average system here on display ... Synergy and acoustic,electrical and mechanical embeddings do ...

There is a minimal acoustical satisfaction treshold where i am...

There is an optimally higher acoustical satisfaction threshold where you probably are ... Marc Lavigne system is more certainly there ...

But the difference between these two acoustical experiences is more defined by synergy and embeddings controls than by price tag in my experience for most people ...

High end system definition imply an acoustical dedicated room in my book ...This cost much money when done by an acoustician than most audio high end system cost ...😁

Am i deaf?

I consider my system audiophile experience not top high end experience for sure ...Cost : 700 bucks...Sorry if my post is considered insulting for some ...😊

From all the time i had been here , i advocated about synergy and acoustic , electrical, and mechanical embeddings knowledge over price tag or mere separate component design ... most people advocate here for miraculous branded name new component, being it a cable, a new dac, or some speakers or amplifiers , always more costly ......😁

The only miraculous component i would buy someday will be the BACCH filters ...

Psycho-acoustics and acoustics rule the gear experience not the reverse ...

It is fascinating to read audio threads... All is about the gear proposed to the consumers not so much about the way to use it for the optimal results... i know because i learned it the hard way ...Nobody said to me 10 years ago what i just claim in this post as a result of my experience ...I learned it ...

 

 

 

I can’t think of why anyone interested in high end audio would want to have anything to do with USB. It was brought on board because of the PC. No high end system should have a computer in the loop… hence no use for it.

 

 

I must add that for sure you are right ... Any high end system will operate from a file bank in a dac not from the computer...Once this is said ...

My point is that at low cost an audiophile experience is possible even from a USB connection from the computer ...😁

The electrical noise floor level of the house for example can be also a factor more impactful than the computer noise... The speakers resonance can also be way more impactful ... The room acoustic can be way way more negative too ... Each case differ ...many factors are at play ...

My USB computer connection is not ideal but the acoustic experience is so good already i cannot even think of upgrading it ...

I can’t think of why anyone interested in high end audio would want to have anything to do with USB. It was brought on board because of the PC. No high end system should have a computer in the loop… hence no use for it.

Funny your comment @ghdprentice all the high end streamers/ servers from Innuos, Taiko, and the like use USB, using usb is not for pc any more.  Take a look around even Grimm has USB capabilities. 
 

I can’t think of why anyone interested in high end audio would want to have anything to do with USB. It was brought on board because of the PC. No high end system should have a computer in the loop… hence no use for it.

@jacobsdad2000  The DAC I am demo'ing has no usb connection, because it is too old! This will prove to be a considerable detriment to usage as it cannot really connect to today's better streamers, along the lines of what you post. It does have Co-ax, which I am hearing differing things about, some folks tell me that Co-ax sounds worse than today's USB, others better?? Nonetheless, since the better streamers use usb only, it is not a connection option. 

.... some of the lowest price DAC’s are to be had from yesteryear.

WRONG

And many new cheapies out perform most of the 20th century designs.

Only for enjoying music.