Mahgister-what makes you think you are the only 1 that knows certain things?
Where did i say that i am the only one to know ?
I just thank Lavigne for his post because he knows and many others here knows too... But many dont ...They must learn by some that we can enjoy good sound at low cost if we STUDY and EXPERIMENT ... Many here brag about costly components merely then i gave another perspective ... Acoustic panels dont replace dedicated acoustic room either most of the times ... Sorry ...
For most of us that spend tens of thousands of dollars on gear, don’t you think these same people know how to treat their room? The room is a must to do right first.
Spending thousand dollars in component has nothing to do with acoustics ... And acoustics knowledge dont reduce to room acoustic treatment ... And room treatment dont reduce to passive materials treatment ...
A good treated room can cost many thousands of dollars. But the thing is, even if you spend tens of thousands building your room with all the acoustic treatments with the right dimensions, a cheap stereo will still sound cheap.
My dedicated acoustic room cost me nothing because i made it myself not with only absorbing and reflective and diffusive surface in the right balance but i used also one hundred resonators mechanically tuned and others devices of my own ...my hobby was learning acoustic by hand ... Then once more you confuse knowledge with money ... And for what reason my Mission Cyrus speakers must be cheap sound and my Sansui amplifier cheap sound too ? They must sound "cheap"? There exist no concept of "cheap" sound in acoustic .. Even if my gear is modest , it is basically good gear and it is enough to experiment with ...My goal was learning not bragging about my gear ...
But this same room will allow your better equipment like the Revels the OP has, to sound their best. It would be foolish to spend thousands on the room if you have cheap equipment, but at the same time, it would be foolish if you didn’t do this if you have good quality equipment, like the Revels.
What is your point ? the fact that my speakers cannot rival the Revel speakers does not means that my sound quality is condemned to be "cheap" even in a dedicated room ... A minimal satiosfaction threshold was my goal not the TOP OPTIMAL one whcho for sure will cost much more money than what i have ...
All my post was there to motivate people to be creative at peanuts cost ... If they own a dedicated room for sure ... Nobody can experiment much in a living room ...
Then you have no point against my posts and associating a good sound with price tag is the summum of ignorance because it is NOT EVEN WRONG in many case ...If you feel that i know better than you feel free to feel it but my goal was not to patronize you but to speak about my experience .... I never brag about my system price tag and i NEVER associate good acoustic experience with a big amount of money ... I advocated for acoustic experiments at no cost ... What is your problem with my knowledge ?
And i dont have a "cheap" soundfield experience by the way at all , and my active modified speakers are low cost and my headphone low cost too ...
Guess why ?