I did not wanted to go further with you in this debate ...i even tried to create a better communication with a mid ground position between you and me in a post above ...
But i must reply to your sarcasm and twisted interpretation to suit your "taste" ...
But you seems to use a lot AD HOMINEM arguments or sarcasms ... I dont used these attacks ... I explained why i think that if taste play a role in audio it does not play the most important role which main role is training ourself in acoustics understanding not mere room acoustic among other things ...
But here you misread me for the sake of attacking my character or i perhaps lacked clarity ...😁
I never said that i was satisfied myself with a stop gap low cost system...
I said explicitly that BEFORE reading about acoustics and before to learn how to go with experiments in my room , BEFORE learning about vibrations and resonance controls and making my own experiments , and BEFORE learning a bit about noise floor level controls and EMI shielding , BEFORE all that i was ignorant and i did not know how to upgrade my system and how to be satisfied completely and not frustrated ...
I learned , i had read, i experimented ; now i am happy and i know why and how ...And it has nothing to do with taste ...
" I used acoustics concepts applied full time for more than one year ... Why? Because before i experimented my "taste" was completely uninformed and i did not know how to be satisfied by sound in my room with my system. "
"" i did not know how to be satisfied by sound in my room with my system. "
That explain almost everything about you as an audiophile .
One year ago your knowledge level on your " new toy " was very low and now you are satisfied: good.Now you are a " skilled " gentleman. Good, to each his own.
