2. speakers
  3. 185771-120267

Harbeth M40.1 vs. M40.2 vs. M40.2 Anniversary Edition vs. M40.3XD

Anyone have experience with the multiple iterations of big Harbeths? I'm thinking about replacing my Wilson Sasha W/P with something leaner on the top end and overall more pleasant. I like to listen at 90dB+ occasionally and want impact without fatigue. From what I've gathered, some people have found the Anniversary and XD versions a bit too analytical, less of that relaxed Harbeth sound.

Amps are ARC Ref 160M's, PrimaLuna EVO 400 preamp, Holo May KTE DAC

For context, I've lived with and LOVED Harbeth P3ESR's in another system for years. Love the midrange beauty, they've always just sounded right to me. 

audio_bidder
pdreher's avatar
pdreher
1,242 posts
 

@audio_bidder Congrats on your purchase.  If I had to do it all over again, I would have kept my 40.1's and passed on the 40.2 Anni's, as the two are very similar and I think I found the 40.1's more enjoyable than the 40.2 Anni's, 

noromance's avatar
noromance
10,203 posts
 

Congrats. I've heard the 40.x in the New York Audio Show and they were pulled halfway into the room to tame the bass. Suggest you try the same.

jjss49's avatar
jjss49
6,612 posts
 

i agree that one of the main issues/challenges in most conventional sized listening rooms with the mon 40’s is placement relative to room boundaries to dial in a smooth and articulate (and not overpowering) midbass and bass response vis a vis boundary reinforcement at those frequencies

proper stands matter in this regard as well

enjoy!

More to discover