"musical" cannot be put in words except by using synonyms as in the Merriam Webster...
Almost any word can be used as a synonym for another word. Including the words you have been using. Sorry, but that is just what language has evolved to.
"musical" can be defined in acoustic factors as these factors can be controlled in a room by some ears/brain EXPERIMENTING ...
Fine. But you have yet to provide a coherent definition of what is more musical. "Buy an Atmasphere amp is the most concise thing I've read by you so far.
We know for example that the transients are important in the timbre "musical" judgement by a listener...
To improve the transients it is possible for example to play with the room ratio between absorption, reflective and diffusive surface ...
Okay, I'll give you points for "improved transients." If one piece of gear compared to another piece of gear produces "improved transients" that piece of gear may meet some of the definitions of "more musical." However, some musicians probably are also able to produce music with transients that are better than the transients than other musicians can. If that's the case, "more musical" may go beyond just gear and room acoustics?
To give another example, imaging will be greatly improve by the listener location and the speakers location and the wise use of the lateral reflections at the right timing ...
I'll give you points for that also. Better imaging should be "more musical." I have never argued that the room and the placement of speakers in the room was not important to imaging. But I'd also say that the most noticeable improvement in my last upgrade (the preamp) was definition and imaging. And yes, I admit that I did play around with speaker placement and adding rugs to tweak that.
Or as any idiot i can ask forever a definition of musical in words that dont exist , because "musical" being an acoustic concept suppose some ears/brain and a pair of hands modifying the room acoustic parameters to his liking and after studying the concepts of timbre , immersiveness and spatial qualities in such a way and enough then he had learn what to do instead of changing cables and gear without end...
Well, actually it appears that words do exist. But if words didn't exist, then it would be up to everyone what their own feelings about "more musical" is. And then it would be subjective.
Then you will understand what is a "musical" timbre perception by being able to perceive any of his aspects ...
So I assume you are talking about accurate timbre, not timbre that is pleasing?
For timbre there is 5 aspects to play with.... You cannot put this understanding and set of experiments with specific gear in a specific room in few words...You must experiment with acoustic concepts... Even if i paste any text acoustics if you dont play with the parameters associated with these concepts you will not understand ... Acoustics is an APPLIED knowledge not words and not even equations because hearing is too complex ...
That doesn't tell the OP what the answer to his question is.
Do you get it ?
Or will you roll in laughters ?
You are saying "more musical" means improved transients and imaging and more accurate reproduction of timbre? Okay . . . that is something solid that OP can hang is hat on. However, as I just replied (somewhere up above) to Atmasphere, equipment that one will find "more musical" for one genre may not work for another genre. No, I am ot laughing . . . this time around you did not answer OP's question by saying that the definition of "more musical" is equipment and room acoustics upgrades. But that was funny.
