How can you not have multichannel system


I just finished listening to Allman Bros 'Live at the Fillmore East" on SACD, and cannot believe the 2-channel 'Luddites' who have shunned multichannel sound. They probably shun fuel injected engines as well. Oh well, their loss, but Kal has it right.
mig007
I'm questioning your being completely dismissive of any point of view or preference but your own and you can only respond by attempting to insult me by saying my room lighting doesn't suit your taste? So if it doesn't suit you it can't be right? ...kind of my whole point
Post removed 
It's my fault really, I should have known better than to post in this thread...I'm very glad you've found a listening environment that makes you happy Mig007, enjoy!

I'm out.
[Captain's Log] We're fast approaching the planet Vinylphilia where the inhabitants, Vinylphiliacs are reporting a crisis with its turntables suffering from unstable platter rotation. [Capt Kirk to Spock] Are we closer to a solution? [Spock], no, captain, but I have been running simulations of the problem on Ensign Smuck's system, and I believe it is related to the 'Fremer' affect where speakers not costing at least $20000 a pair can produce instability among lower priced equipment . . . [Kirk to Scotty] I need full warp speed . . . We need to reach Vinylphilia before their turntables suffer catastrophic failure, and the inhabitants will have to use back up cd players. Perish the thought.
I have not had the opportunity to listen to a really good multichannel system/setup with music as the predominant medium. I've heard some pretty darned impressive multichannel systems featuring DVD movie format. Additionally, I only have a two-channel system. This is my disclaimer - since the hostiles are a bit ramped up here.
That being said, I have always been of the impression that two-channel audio, for music, presents the most realistic soundstage, including the best centralized imaging capabilities. I would not be surprised however, if advancements in technology will (or possibly already have) change the proverbial playing field, or at least offer legitimate alternatives. When multichannel gets it right, does it merely provide a realistic “concert hall” experience, or does it also capture the essence of the performance – sans reverb, room acoustics and atmosphere? Just what is mixed into the other channels? The stage is always coming at you from in front of your position. Certainly, a multichannel mix does not include any instruments/vocals coming from anywhere other than the front – right???? So, what is being channeled to the other channels - reverb, crowd noise…what? What am I missing here?
I heard a multichannel Black Crows DVD at the local Best Buy and found it laughable to hear the guitar coming from the rear channel. I’m sure it was a bad mix, and for certain it was….well, it was a Best Buy system. Anyway, in defining the differences between two-channel and multichannel, just what are some of the more significant characteristics/qualities of one format over the other? I mean in addition to the whole horse drawn carriage analogy and Reggie Jackson quote - which is over my head!