I absolutely agree with @jji666 . And there’s a ton of support for his position from a subset of the audiophile community, that includes engineers, designers, Roon Labs itself!
There seems to be a bias embedded in the arguments from a different subset of audiophiles. It goes like this: “I hear a difference. If you don’t hear a difference, my experience trumps yours.” That makes no sense from a logic perspective. In the absence of any other explanations, those two observations have equal weight. It is certainly possible that one person has a more resolving system, and/or better ears, but ceteris paribus, they have equal weight. But then, when you introduce the digital science, that seems to give more weight to the listener who hears nothing. But wait, the first listener hears a difference, that has to be explained by science too, doesn’t it? Well yes, as a matter of fact, there’s a whole science behind confirmation bias. Now to be clear, the second listener is also susceptible to confirmation bias, perhaps to hear nothing. But on balance, the better argument goes to the second listener, because that argument does not require an assumption about greater resolution, golden ears, pseudo science, or faith, to make sense.
Btw, when I started my own journey on the streaming side, before I did any serious research, I assumed I’d hear a huge qualitative difference when I changed servers and cobbled together a Raspberry Pi as one of my first post-retirement projects (i.e., my own bias was to hear differences). Just my two cents….