@erik_squires wrote:
"The biggest problems I’ve heard/seen have been excessively large peaks in the subwoofer range. Sometimes those peaks put out 20x more power into a room than the rest of the subwoofer. Think about that!! Your 1000 W sub is putting out 20,000 watts worth of power in some very narrow bands. Of course that will sound bad and muddied."
Well written; you really put it into perspective!
No SUBWOOFER is that bad all by itself. However the subwoofer+room INTERACTION can be that bad, even with a superb subwoofer. And said interaction doesn’t have to be THAT bad to still be really bad.
In the bass region, imo the INTERACTION of subwoofer + room IS the "elephant in the room"; the uncomfortable-to-acknowledge, difficult-to-deal-with thing.
I agree with you that the bass-region dips are perceptually benign relative to the peaks.
And those peaks are perceptually even worse than they look on paper: Note that the Equal Loudness Curves bunch up south of 100 Hz. So what happens is, a 5 dB peak at 40 Hz can be perceptually comparable to a 10 dB peak at 1 kHz!
The ear’s heightened sensitivity to changes in SPL in the bass region is one of the reasons why it can take a long time to dial in the correct level on a subwoofer (those maddeningly-small knobs are another). On the other hand, the reduction of those peaks makes a PERCEIVED qualitative improvement greater than one would expect just from eyeballing the before-and-after curves.
I agree with pretty much everything you went into detail about.
Duke