To Focal or not to Focal


I was thinking about a upgrade to the focal line maybe the Thieva #3

My current set up is a McCormack Dna1,Rogue audio Rp1 and Nht 2.9 speakers. Would this be a worthwhile upgrade or could I upgrade to a Rugue st100 tube amp.Which is the better upgrade suggestions welcome

128x128thirsty93

Really depends on what improvements you’re looking for and what sound characteristics are most important to you. There are tons of speakers out there other than Focal so if you share more about what specifically you’re looking for you’ll get better recommendations here.  BTW, you’ve got a great amp, and if anything I’d upgrade your preamp.

Focals tend to be hard on amplifiers, delivering sub-par bass unless your amp is pretty stiff.  They also have a unique sound and off-axis presentation which has a lot of fans, but also means you should not go there without listening.

Also, room acoustics matter. 

@erik_squires good points about the Focals being power hungry and the room acoustics.
I used to have DNA 0.5, DNA125 and 225. All are great amps. I also owned Rogue ST100 with RP1.
It’s been a long time, probably 20+ years since I heard those NHT speakers, but I still have the AC1 center channel that I just recently replaced with Focal Aria CC900 purchased together with the standmount Aria 906.
The CC900 is a better speaker than the NHT.
And the Aria 906 have definitely surprised me in a good way, driven by a Marantz AVR.

So my recommendation would be to upgrade the speakers. Keep the RP1/DNA1 combo. I think you’ll like the Focals - they’re warm and very engaging sounding speakers.