Sorry but you are deluded by marketing audiophilia...
No acoustician need the opinion of a crowd of audiophiles, they need their ears and basic knowledge...
I am not an acoustician but i know some basic and tuned my own room... ( with 100 Helmholtz resonators tuned mechanically and i modified the porthole of my speakers and their waveguide and i modified my headphone then... I dont need your opinion about my system limits and qualities i already know them ... Guess how ? š You know enough about me now to know the right answer, but i wll write it to spare you heavy thinking : acoustic experiments...
And i will add that a good sound is not the result of an audiophilia marketing contest , it could be yes, but i dont need to participate...
A minimal acoustic satisfaction threshold exist where all factors in spite of their measured and audible limitations exhibit a very high S.Q. experience with a relatively low price tag... A maximum acoustic satisfaction threshold exist too and you need a dedicated acoustic room anyway to reach this target also...
The gear price tags if synergy is there matter less in the two case : minimal or maximal satisfaction threshold.. Guess why ? š
In conclusion my system is not amazing for all in the absolute, it is amazing taken into account the ratio between cost and S.Q.Ā and taking into accountĀ the resulting balance between each acousticsĀ experienced concepts describing the experience . ( Timbre and immersiveness if we pick the two most general one)
If knowledgeable people arenāt coming over to listen to your system and tell you that it is amazing then it probably isnāt and you are deluded.