Mobile Fidelity Settlement Update

@deep_333 Are you referring to me ? i didn’t file a claim with MoFi. I suggest even a child might offer to retract such a petulant immature post. 

Just a simple question here.  How many people here think that the MoFi LPs they purchased that have a digital stage sound better than the same files when played in the purely digital domain?  And why do they think that they sound better through a lp based system?

deep-333 calling someone low class, how rich.

I did like the video explaining recording.it is very educational

I don’t think he meant that literally... But, mofi’s process has been the most foolproof w.r.t mitigating unnecessary abuse of the tape and offering the best fidelity on vinyl.

Bingo. There are factors of context involved.  MoFi decided on a process to minimize possible degradation and/or damage to original Master Tapes whether they are used once or multiple times.  The MoFi process for public consumption has been available since at least 2018, probably longer.  The nuts and bolts details are considered proprietary (intellectual property) so MoFi has every right to protect their investment in R&D.  The DSD step is mentioned in the public domain. The parties claiming damage apparently failed to read information readily available.

It was reported the first two parties claiming damage wanted a $10K each payment.  Quite a bit more than the cost of 1 or several LPs, so clearly looking for an undeserved payday.