Does it have to sound good for you to like it?


I listen mainly to classical music.  The SQ of classical recordings is all over the place, not nearly as consistent other types of music.  Recording large orchestras is a complicated and difficult endeavor. Smaller ensembles are easier to record. So, if you listen to a great performance of an orchestral (or any) recording but have trouble with the sound will you avoid listening to it?

128x128rvpiano

@inna - Ultimately, the band decides. Parsons own recordings are better. But then again, technology improves with time. 1975 and 1990 is a big difference. I just got 2018 remix of Animals on vinyl, haven't have time to dig into it.

@drbay 

Some of the best songs in the world are very poorly recorded. Eg: The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face by Roberta Flack. 

Beautiful song and an amazing singer. I have my parents to thank for exposing me to her and many other greats as a little kid (I was born in 1964). Dad had a reel to reel that was like a hard shell suitcase. I wish I knew what is was.

Have you listened to the Qobuz HR version of First Take? It sounds pretty good to me. 

@simonmoon Great back-story, thanks for sharing.

For the vast majority of time, I listen to music, and pay almost no attention to how my gear is performing. I am a music first audiophile.

Same here.

et al

Each to his own, but I was honestly just trying to apply a little levity and the statement doesn’t offend me. It’s just someone’s opinion after all.

If everyone is honest, this part "Audiophiles use your music to listen to their equipment.” is sometimes true for everyone here as simonmoon suggested.

Who doesn’t have a set of reference material to audition gear or show your system in its best light to a friend?

Oh, so "audiophile" is about gear then. Well, this is exactly what Alan said.  He has tons of real gear in properly treated rooms at his workplaces :-) For some reason I don't think they elevate cables off the floor.

@mikhailark No, the point is Parsons isn’t necessarily in touch at all with what drives audiophiles, and from the video showing both his home setup and words that would certainly seem to be the case.  And you have no idea what equipment he has at his workplaces or how the rooms are treated, so that’s just pure conjecture based on nothing but your imagination.  The only thing we know is that setup/room in his house which is crap that no audiophile in his/her right mind would have or endure. 

Right. Sometimes I do listen to mostly for the sound but rarely, though the music still has to be good. If I don't like it I won't listen at all.

mikhailark, if the band, Pink Floyd in this case, decides then why did they settle for less? They had enough resources to make that recording much better. Analog recording technology was fully developed by 1975.